Re: why more than one temp file for a single rsync download?

Felipe Alvarez (felipe.alva...@gmail.com) wrote on 25 February 2010 08:59: >A large file (2+ GB) needs to be transfered, but I see more than one >temp file for it. One temp file is larger than the other, but this >morning I tried to rsync again, and it DID NOT resume the largest temp >file - it

source-filter_dest-filter patch and --no-whole-file

Hi, I am looking at using the source-filter_dest-filter patch with rsync 3.0.7. The patch sets the --whole-file option (i.e. disables the rsync algorithm) when either --source-filter or --dest-filter are given. I can't see any reason why these new features won't work with --no-whole-file. I tri

why more than one temp file for a single rsync download?

A large file (2+ GB) needs to be transfered, but I see more than one temp file for it. One temp file is larger than the other, but this morning I tried to rsync again, and it DID NOT resume the largest temp file - it resumed the smaller one. Is there an explanation of this behaviour? I didn't want