> On Thu 17 Dec 2009, Joel Peabody wrote:
>>
>> PS, this is between two Redhat machines using rsync 2.6.8 on both ends.
>> Upgrading rsync is not an option in this case.
>
> What I always wonder when reading such messages, is what type of
> response is expected, if a problem with the tool is suspec
On Thu 17 Dec 2009, Joel Peabody wrote:
>
> PS, this is between two Redhat machines using rsync 2.6.8 on both ends.
> Upgrading rsync is not an option in this case.
What I always wonder when reading such messages, is what type of
response is expected, if a problem with the tool is suspected but
u
>From what Ive read, there are no hard limits on what rsync will accept as
far as amount of data to transfer, number of files, or the size of any one
file. However, in looking at the output of one particular job it looks
like its just putting out directories when it gets to a new one, and not
th
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6996
Summary: syncing backups - autodetect older variants already
existing on receiver
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.0
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6916
--- Comment #5 from jzel...@redhat.com 2009-12-17 02:23 CST ---
Well, it's possible. I'm not rsync maintainer for long, so I don't have that
much knowledge about the situation. But my point was that zlib's upstream is
willing to consider
