Has anyone compiled rsync with other newer compilers like Intel 11.1? Does
this break anything?
My quick test shows rsync-3.1.0 performance jumps to ~120MB/sec.
Greg
On Nov 13, 2009, at 10:44 AM, Greg Siekas wrote:
> Wayne,
>
> Transferring an 8gb file using rsync between a network (10G
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 13:33:08 -0500
Matt McCutchen wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 12:36 +0100, Heinz-Josef Claes wrote:
> > On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 01:38:48 -0500
> > Matt McCutchen wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 18:20 +0100, Heinz-Josef Claes wrote:
> > > > I want to check if the following is po
Hi,
At http://www.alanbonnici.com/videos/cwrsync.asp I have created a video
tutorial on how to install and configure rsync running on a windows
platform.
It is a works-in-progress document. If you have any corrections or comments
please email me.
Regards,
Alan Bonnici
--
Please use reply-all fo
Wayne,
Transferring an 8gb file using rsync between a network (10GbE) mounted
filesystem and local disk.
rsync-2.6.9 - 88-95 MB/sec
rsync-3.0.6 - 62-72 MB/sec
rsync-3.1.0 - 86-90 MB/sec
Doing a cp of the file yields 140-160MB/sec.
It appears the IO code improvements in 3.1 have definitely ma
On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 12:36 +0100, Heinz-Josef Claes wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 01:38:48 -0500
> Matt McCutchen wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 18:20 +0100, Heinz-Josef Claes wrote:
> > > I want to check if the following is possible:
> > >
> > > 1. transport a big block of data (several teraby
On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 08:38 -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Philip Pokorny
> wrote:
> How confident are you in the current state of 3.1.0.pre and
> the nightly snapshots? Should I be concerned about running
> this on production data?
>
> Per
On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 08:43 -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Matt McCutchen
> wrote:
> The best approach for now is probably to backport the
> --delete-missing-args changes to 3.0.6.
>
> In the future, I'd suggest starting with the head of the b3.0.x
--fuzzy search.
The real world applications are obvious. Apart from software packages
as described in https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3392#c7
(thanks for tha link!), which is aspecial case, using rsync friendly
gzip/zlib compression, there is the large area of media files.
Example:
F
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> The best approach for now is probably to backport the --delete-missing-args
> changes to 3.0.6.
In the future, I'd suggest starting with the head of the b3.0.x branch.
That currently gets you one extra commit, an xattr-related memory fix
(
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Philip Pokorny <
ppoko...@penguincomputing.com> wrote:
> How confident are you in the current state of 3.1.0.pre and the nightly
> snapshots? Should I be concerned about running this on production data?
>
Personally, I'm almost ready to start using it in product
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 01:38:48 -0500
Matt McCutchen wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 18:20 +0100, Heinz-Josef Claes wrote:
> > Am Montag, 9. November 2009 17:48:35 schrieb Matt McCutchen:
> > > On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 11:43 +0100, Heinz-Josef Claes wrote:
> > > > does anybody know what's the maximum fi
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5583
henrik-rs...@prak.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||henrik-rs...@prak.org
--- Co
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6881
way...@samba.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 9:11 PM, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> I'm guessing the "uid = 0" and "gid = 0" in the test daemon
> configuration were disabled so that the daemon tests could run for
> unprivileged users.
>
Right. I've checked in a fix that ensures that uid & gid are specified when
the test i
14 matches
Mail list logo
