Re: strange log values in 3.1

On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Carlos Carvalho wrote: > All files are new. What I find strange is that I'd expect the transfered > bytes to be somewhat larger than the file sizes > Yeah, there are two problems. One was that the %b modifier requires late-logging (after the transfer finishes), a

strange log values in 3.1

I've just got the log lines below. The first line shows the format spec that prints each column: %'b %'l %f 0 18,760 f1 0 11,193 f2 32,768 2,186 f3 3,128,368 3,453,856 f4 13,680 11,786 f5 32,768 6,288 f

Re: hard links on samba shares

On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Matt McCutchen wrote: > On Fri, 2009-10-23 at 11:31 +0200, Paul Slootman wrote: >> On Fri 23 Oct 2009, Matt McCutchen wrote: >> > On Fri, 2009-10-23 at 09:15 +0200, Riccardo Iaconelli wrote: >> > > >> > > [r...@popper linksys]# rsync -avz --hard-links test/ test2/

Re: build on osx 10.6

I don't know, I was just theoretically guessing. I don't have a computer on 10.6 so I'm just fine with rsync :) Le 25 oct. 09 à 18:36, Robert DuToit a écrit : Hi Vitorio, Yes -I kind of figured default was that now. What would be the way to get i386 back: would ./configure -arch i386 -a

Re: bugs in version 3.1

Wayne Davison (way...@samba.org) wrote on 24 October 2009 15:32: >On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 2:41 PM, Carlos Carvalho wrote: > >> The first is that when running with --files-from and -ii unmodified >> files are not put in the log. > > >That is not a logging issue, but rather an early-terminatio

Re: build on osx 10.6

Hi Vitorio, Yes -I kind of figured default was that now. What would be the way to get i386 back: would ./configure -arch i386 -arch x86_64 work? Rob On Oct 25, 2009, at 1:30 PM, Mac User FR wrote: For me this is a problem of gcc config on X.6. It's targetting x64 by default instead o

Re: build on osx 10.6

For me this is a problem of gcc config on X.6. It's targetting x64 by default instead of x86. Cheers, Vitorio Le 25 oct. 09 à 18:19, Robert DuToit a écrit : Hi All, I've been off list for a while and just got around to building rsync 3.0.6 on Mac OSX 10.6 intel core 2 duo machine. It runs

build on osx 10.6

Hi All, I've been off list for a while and just got around to building rsync 3.0.6 on Mac OSX 10.6 intel core 2 duo machine. It runs great on similar machines but someone just said it won't for their OSX 10.6 intel core duo and returns an error: rsync Bad CPU type in executable. I che

Re: avoid rsync deleting vanished files on receiver

Hello Carlos Thank you for your answer. no the exit code is 24... I also sometimes get exit code 23, but then rsync does it correctly... What would be the effect of the file system reporting "permission denied" while reading directories? A list with files missing ? HC Carlos Carvalho skre