On 14/09/2009, at 2:22 PM, Eric S. Johansson wrote:
Unfortunately, the QOS solution only works for the platform you
develop it for. On the other hand, the bwlimit solution works for
almost every platform but doesn't behave well if there are multiple
rsync clients talking to one hopes. The
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 22:22:34 -0400, Eric S. Johansson wrote:
> It is all within one tool and there's no way you can hurt or damage
> anyone else through its use.
It is also within one instance of the tool. What if two of your remote
users rsync at the same time? Twenty? What if someone has a
On 9/13/2009 9:20 PM, Matt McCutchen wrote:
On Sun, 2009-09-13 at 21:02 -0400, Eric S. Johansson wrote:
I am using rsync to back up across a VPN. Unfortunately, every so often the
home office miscreants drop a big block of data into the backup and that
particular backup cycle takes many hours.
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 21:20:01 -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> How about the suggestions you were given on the rsnapshot list?
Assuming that you're using Linux somewhere in the mix, its ability to put
different network traffic into different pools for purposes of rate
management is (1) admittedly
On Sun, 2009-09-13 at 21:02 -0400, Eric S. Johansson wrote:
> I am using rsync to back up across a VPN. Unfortunately, every so often the
> home office miscreants drop a big block of data into the backup and that
> particular backup cycle takes many hours. These same people also complain
> whe
I am using rsync to back up across a VPN. Unfortunately, every so often the
home office miscreants drop a big block of data into the backup and that
particular backup cycle takes many hours. These same people also complain when
net pipe is filled during the day.
What I need is an ability to
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4488
--- Comment #1 from m...@mattmccutchen.net 2009-09-13 16:28 CST ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> Having an unreadable (unix permissions set to no read access) directory within
> the source directory causes a complaint that is apparently co
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5637
--- Comment #1 from m...@mattmccutchen.net 2009-09-13 16:23 CST ---
This is almost certainly a deficiency in the destination filesystem which rsync
can't do anything about.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cg
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6719
Summary: I/O error protection is broken w/ protocol 30 and
incremental recursion
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.6
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Seve
On Sat, 2009-09-12 at 18:22 -0300, Carlos Carvalho wrote:
> Sanjay Acharya (svachary...@gmail.com) wrote on 11 September 2009 11:02:
> >How is rsync supposed to behave when I give the --delete-excluded?
>
> >From the manual for the --delete option:
>
>If the sending side detects any I/O erro
10 matches
Mail list logo
