https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6422
--- Comment #2 from vap...@gentoo.org 2009-09-05 16:31 CST ---
i'd agree if i was attempting to do an actual operation on the current
directory (like `rsync -a ./ foo:/`), but when the current directory is wholly
irrelevant, it shouldnt
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6546
--- Comment #3 from d...@yost.com 2009-09-05 15:36 CST ---
Ordinary warnings and data dependent errors are not bugs and shouldn't look
like bugs. Source code file name and line number makes it look like a bug and
should not be shown exce
Yup, by doing --inplace, I got down from 30 mins to 24 mins... So that's
slightly better than resending the whole file again.
However, this doesn't really do what I was hoping to do. Perhaps it can't
be done, or somebody would like to recommend some other product that is more
well suited for m
On Sat, 2009-09-05 at 14:25 +0200, Gilles-Alexandre wrote:
> I think IMHO that the description of the option "--checksum-seed"
> should be :
>
> "--checksum-seed=NUM spécifie le grain de sable pour la somme de
> contrôle"
The rsync project does not maintain a French manpage. Please report
t
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6546
m...@mattmccutchen.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|INVALI
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6694
--- Comment #1 from bugzi...@baldwin.users.panix.com 2009-09-05 13:28 CST
---
Further testing shows that not only is the mask not preserved on transfer, but
if it already exists, it is eliminated!
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzil
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6694
Summary: rsync -A drops mask from ACL
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.6
Platform: Sparc
OS/Version: Solaris
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6413
--- Comment #2 from t...@fred.net 2009-09-05 13:05 CST ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> I'm not sure why the links don't show up underlined for you, since they are
> underlined by default and nothing in the pages affects that setting.
>
>
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6597
--- Comment #3 from jari.aa...@cante.net 2009-09-05 12:57 CST ---
Please update the indicator to use IEEE standard KiB (Not K/b etc) or ISO Kb/s,
Mb/s if that is the unit in question.
-- Jari
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.sa
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6603
way...@samba.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6597
way...@samba.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6546
way...@samba.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6542
way...@samba.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #2 from way.
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6508
way...@samba.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6461
way...@samba.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6422
way...@samba.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6413
way...@samba.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6376
way...@samba.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6362
way...@samba.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6362
way...@samba.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #4648|application/octet-stream|text/plain
mime type|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6362
--- Comment #3 from way...@samba.org 2009-09-05 10:26 CST ---
Created an attachment (id=4648)
--> (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=4648&action=view)
A shell script to duplicate the issue
My test script for the issue.
--
Hi there,
I think IMHO that the description of the option "--checksum-seed"
should be :
"--checksum-seed=NUM spécifie le grain de sable pour la somme de
contrôle"
Or at least :
"--checksum-seed=NUM spécifie le grain pour la somme de contrôle"
But Not :
--checksum-seed=NUM spécif
22 matches
Mail list logo
