On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 08:49:10PM +0100, Kirk Maule wrote:
> Should the rsync*.tar.gz install procedure replaced rsyncd 2.6.8 as
> well as rsync 2.6.8 with the 3.0.6 version?
Depends on how the package was built. Rsync is just one executable, so
be sure to put it in a consistent spot. For your
Wayne Davison (way...@samba.org) wrote on 22 August 2009 09:15:
>On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 02:13:00AM -0300, Carlos Carvalho wrote:
>> There can be several partials in the partial dir for the same file,
>> resulting from more than one interruption.
>
>No, there is only one partial file. Don't c
Good call. I observed rsyncd 2.6.8 starting up in the /var/log/rsyncd.log.
Should the rsync*.tar.gz install procedure replaced rsyncd 2.6.8 as well as
rsync 2.6.8 with the 3.0.6 version?
Stopped the rscyncd and re-ran the install of the tar.gz but no change. The
install was done as root.
Cheers,
I was just thinking -- would it be possible to just 'emulate' xattrs on
systems that
don't support them natively with a "--Xe" switch -- that would store the
xattrs
in a file "..xattr" in the same dir as the copied file. The
switch only be
paid attention to on systems that don't support xattrs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6569
way...@samba.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 02:13:00AM -0300, Carlos Carvalho wrote:
> There can be several partials in the partial dir for the same file,
> resulting from more than one interruption.
No, there is only one partial file. Don't confuse a partial file with a
temp file, which are different things in rsyn
On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 12:42:47AM -0500, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Is this actually a difference that was one way in an earlier (2.6.9)
> version and is different in the later (3.0.4) version?
>
> That seems unlikely to me...
Yes, very unlikely. The combination of the options --include=Temp/**/
an
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 11:22:40AM +0100, Kirk Maule wrote:
> Both rsync versions are 3.0.6 protocol version 30.
You'll undoubtedly find that there is an older rsync on the $PATH on one
of the machines. e.g, try this:
ssh hostname rsync --version
Either get rid of the old version, or specify --
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 08:41:40PM +0200, Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote:
> My problem is that I would like to synchronize a directory located
> inside "/Ma musique/", the one named "/Ma musique/iTunes/".
As you noticed, rsync will not synchronize anything whose parent dir
gets excluded. To fix this, sto
Hi there,
We are using rsync 3.0.6 on two identical SLES 10.2 servers. The
destination server is running rsyncd. When I include the -X switch in the
rsync command from the source I get the following:
--xattrs requires protocol 30 or higher (negotiated 29).
rsync error: protocol incompatibility
10 matches
Mail list logo