On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 22:39 -0500, Rahul Nabar wrote:
> > If you're not using different partitions on different disks, then
> doing
> > anything in parallel is probably going to slow it down
> (reading/writing
> > all over the disk, means more seektime, which means waiting).
>
> No, its just a sin
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Leen Besselink wrote:
> I think Daniel was trying to say, cpu might not be the bottleneck, it could
> be network or something else (I doubt it's memory rsync 3 pretty much solved
> that for most) and if you ask me it's probably disk.
Ah! I see. Thanks for the clarif
Rahul Nabar wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 12:09 AM, Daniel.Li wrote:
>
>> I think multi-client can improve performance, but limit is the same as
>> above.
>
> I don't think I understand! Can I start more than one "rsync --daemon"
> instances then?
>
>
>> What kind of performance you are conce
Ryan Malayter wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Leen Besselink wrote:
>> For people who don't know what it does, it implements backup of open files
>> on Windows with rsync.
>
>> My hope is to get something that works so well to have it included it in the
>> cwrsync-installer:
>> http://w
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 12:09 AM, Daniel.Li wrote:
> I think multi-client can improve performance, but limit is the same as
> above.
I don't think I understand! Can I start more than one "rsync --daemon"
instances then?
> What kind of performance you are concerning, network/cpu/ram/disk
> IO ...
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Leen Besselink wrote:
> For people who don't know what it does, it implements backup of open files on
> Windows with rsync.
> My hope is to get something that works so well to have it included it in the
> cwrsync-installer:
> http://www.itefix.no/i2/cwrsync
> Thei
On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 11:01 +0530, Jignesh Shah wrote:
> You are correct Carlos but it wasn't happening with rsync-2.6 and
> started happening with rsync-3.0.6. Do you have any idea on this?
The "could not make way" error message is new in rsync 3.0.0 (see
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?i