Thanks Matt and Dave,
But now I'm a bit confused, it doesn't work because it has not been done
yet, but it's the default?
Are there any plans of improving the performance with local files?
Do you mind if I give it a go?
Thanks,
Amir
--
From: "Dav
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 09:59:16AM -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-05-14 at 15:59 +0300, Amir Rapson wrote:
> > Running rsync with --whole-file yields poorer performance results than
> > a simple "cp".
> > Looking at the code - it looks like "copy_file" isn't really called
> > when I a
Not sure if this got through to the list as I haven't received it back as
usually happens...
> Hi,
> I have a file that changes slightly in size every day and has the timestamp
> appended to it.. for example on the 14th may:
>
> MybackedUpFileBlabla_200905140219.bak
>
> This is transferred by rsy
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6362
Summary: --dry-run conflicts with --hard-links
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.0
Platform: x64
URL: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500605
OS/Version: Linux
Status:
