Big Thanks Wayne for your valuable information.
-Jignesh
On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 12:09 AM, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 04:50:40PM +0530, Jignesh Shah wrote:
> > I am wondering if we upgrade rsync 3.0.5 then will it cause any
> > unexpected behaviour then rsync 2.6.7?
>
> Proba
On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 11:41 -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 03:46:38PM -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> > The only thing I see different between rsync 2.6.7 and 3.0.5 is
> > that 3.0.5 puts thousand separators in the numbers:
>
> That's a 3.1.0dev feature, not 3.0.5.
You're ri
On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 03:46:38PM -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> The only thing I see different between rsync 2.6.7 and 3.0.5 is
> that 3.0.5 puts thousand separators in the numbers:
That's a 3.1.0dev feature, not 3.0.5.
..wayne..
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the m
On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 04:50:40PM +0530, Jignesh Shah wrote:
> I am wondering if we upgrade rsync 3.0.5 then will it cause any
> unexpected behaviour then rsync 2.6.7?
Probably not, but not knowing how you rsync rsync, one can't say for
sure. You can read through the various news files, looking
I have released rsync 3.0.6. This is another bug-fix release.
To see a full summary of the changes since 3.0.5, visit this link:
http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/src/rsync-3.0.6-NEWS
You can download the source tar file and its signature from here:
http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/src/rsyn
Thats great !!! Thanks Wayne for you great reply. could you please also help
me to remove my fear in upgrading rsync 3.0.5.
We have been planning to upgrad rsync 3.0.5. I have some question on this so
that we will not screwed up the file systems. We have been using rsync 2.6.7
since long and we di
Ohhh,,..Thanks Wayne...Got it..
Thanks,
Jignesh
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 8:40 PM, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 04:42:28PM +0530, Jignesh Shah wrote:
> > It does't include the host name, IP address and authenticated user name
> and
> > instead it keep it as "%h %a %u". Could any
