Thanks Paul for helping. I wonder if this method would help what you
described:
1) Create a diff before the update. So in place update is always the case.
2) The diff does not have data, but rather information where in the
destination needs to be updated.
There are still problem to work out f
On Wed 08 Apr 2009, philvh wrote:
>
> I have 2 mounted drive. Each have 60 GB. On each drive, there is a 50 GB
> file (it's a virtual machine) and nothing else.
>
> When I sync one with another, there should not be a problem, because there
> are 10 GB left, and also, shouldn't it re-use the spa
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6251
way...@samba.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
rsync failed because of a disk space problem. However, I think it should not
have this problem.
I have 2 mounted drive. Each have 60 GB. On each drive, there is a 50 GB
file (it's a virtual machine) and nothing else.
When I sync one with another, there should not be a problem, because there
a
On Wed 08 Apr 2009, Yan Seiner wrote:
>
> As long as we're on that topic, a size limit on file size to be
> transferred would be nice.
--max-size=SIZE don't transfer any file larger than SIZE
Paul
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscri
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 07:41:12AM +0530, Jignesh Shah wrote:
> No, I also want to log files that are not transferred.
You can use -vv instead of -ii to get a list of "uptodate" items, but no
mention of attribute changes (non-transferred files are all "uptodate").
In rsync 3.1.0dev you can get tha
On Wed, April 8, 2009 8:13 am, Cyd wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I think you will have to run two commands of rsync from PC1 to Server1 and
> after to Server2. (Case Server1 and Server2 are on different location)
>
> If both server are on LAN, you could make rsync from PC1 to Server1 and do
> after that a s
On Wed, April 8, 2009 8:19 am, Victoria Muntean wrote:
> Is it possible to have rsync order transfers by file size (smallest
> files first) ?
Ooooh, I like that. I have a client that has a bad habit of creating a
5GB zipfile, that, of course, fails to rsync across 3,000 miles. Since
it's a zip
> Tell it is possible to make double-side synchronisation of two servers?
For two-way file sync, try "unison" [1]. Rsync does one-way synchronization.
Viki
[1] http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~bcpierce/unison/
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe
Is it possible to have rsync order transfers by file size (smallest
files first) ?
Would it be a big patch ?
Thanks
Viki
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, r
Hello,
I think you will have to run two commands of rsync from PC1 to Server1 and
after to Server2. (Case Server1 and Server2 are on different location)
If both server are on LAN, you could make rsync from PC1 to Server1 and do
after that a sync of Server1 to Server2.
Regards,
CyD
On Wed, Apr
Help me
Tell it is possible to make double-side synchronisation of two servers?
So that it passed only on time.
For example at an identical set of files on two servers any file on the first
to change, i.e. for it time modify will exchange. It means becomes newer and it
is necessary to transfer it
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6251
muel...@relog.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|INVALID
13 matches
Mail list logo
