Matt McCutchen wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-03-01 at 17:21 -0800, Bill Landry wrote:
>> I just setup my first rsyncd server and all is working well as far as
>> file syncing goes. However, I am a bit baffled by the fact that some of
>> the log entries in the rsyncd.log file are entered in local time and
On Sat, 2009-02-28 at 13:31 +0100, Kurt wrote:
> Hi - is there a clever way to identify files that have been change on
> the local _and_ the remote location? Without such a check it may
> happen, that changes are lost without even noticing.
>
> One way to identify such files would be to do a d
Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 1 Mar 2009, Matt McCutchen wrote:
>> On Sun, 2009-03-01 at 17:21 -0800, Bill Landry wrote:
>
>>> I just setup my first rsyncd server and all is working well as far as
>>> file syncing goes. However, I am a bit baffled by the fact that some of
>>> the
Hi,
On Sun, 1 Mar 2009, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-03-01 at 17:21 -0800, Bill Landry wrote:
> > I just setup my first rsyncd server and all is working well as far as
> > file syncing goes. However, I am a bit baffled by the fact that some of
> > the log entries in the rsyncd.log file a
On Sun, 2009-03-01 at 17:21 -0800, Bill Landry wrote:
> I just setup my first rsyncd server and all is working well as far as
> file syncing goes. However, I am a bit baffled by the fact that some of
> the log entries in the rsyncd.log file are entered in local time and
> other are entered in GMT.
Hi list,
I just setup my first rsyncd server and all is working well as far as
file syncing goes. However, I am a bit baffled by the fact that some of
the log entries in the rsyncd.log file are entered in local time and
other are entered in GMT. Here is a sample:
file upload:
2009/
We sync about 12 million of files for about 4TB from sites around Europe
in less than 3 hours.
Ofcourse we do things in parallel, try to divide the work for different
trees or hosts and run in the background.
Regards, Nico
Ryan Malayter schreef:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 7:20 AM, Mag Gam wrote
Jamie Lokier schreef:
David Howe wrote:
Jamie Lokier wrote:
I am less worried about individual file renames and/or "missing" the
opportunity to diff a large file that has been both moved and updated,
than having to resync multiple gigs of stuff over a slow link, because
some user renamed a
David Howe schreef:
Jamie Lokier wrote:
There are methods to perform efficient updates of large numbers of
files and a large amount of data, across simultaneous renames, copies
and edits. But that is the realm of "similarity detection indexing",
which is beyond the scope of rsync. At leas
Jamie Lokier schreef:
N.J. van der Horn (Nico) wrote:
But you need to verify and update the DB contents - which requires
stat on all the files mentioned in the DB. In other words you might
have to scan everything :-)
This already takes place while Rsync does its job, so it has not
10 matches
Mail list logo
