RE: (Synchronization among clients with history)

2009-01-12 Thread Jeff Allen
Matt, Thank you so much for your detailed advice; I sincerely appreciate your time and help. I'm beginning to realize that the span of this project probably doesn't merit hacking the source of unison or rsync. The directory is small enough that adding an extra copy of it would be feasible; I

Re: Rsync crash

2009-01-12 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 13:29 +0100, Maxence DUNNEWIND wrote: > Anyway, after it has been working well for some time (between 2 and > 24hours), the rsync daemon crashes. I wouldn't call an infinite loop a crash, but whatever. > It is still running but seems to > retry something infinitly. > > The

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5220] Syntax to access a daemon over a socket supplied on a fd

2009-01-12 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5220 --- Comment #6 from m...@mattmccutchen.net 2009-01-12 23:18 CST --- I noticed that this was proposed a long time ago: http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/2003-March/005418.html It looks like JW Schultz was proposing treating a client

Re: how to connect to rsyncd via forwarded ssh port?

2009-01-12 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Sat, 2009-01-10 at 22:32 +0100, Matthias Meyer wrote: > I've running a rsyncd and ssh port forwarding (-R 12345:localhost:873 > bac...@server) > on a client because the client should not reachable but over ssh. > The rsyncd should acessible because I can backup and restore files with > backupp

Re: Rsync error 'unexpected tag 93' when --log-file= parameter is present and run from crontab

2009-01-12 Thread Matt McCutchen
I have some general remarks about the problem; I hope Wayne will have more specific ideas on how to debug it. On Sun, 2009-01-11 at 13:33 +0100, Ernst J. Oud wrote: > rsync -vrpth --stats --progress --log-file=/nslu2/rsync.log > --log-file-format="%t %i %n%L" > --include-from=/nslu2/rsync-files /s

Re: rsync to fat32 on different platforms

2009-01-12 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 09:58 +0100, Andreas Nef wrote: > Only one additional remark so far: The problem seems to be connected > to Windows XP (tested SP 3 so far). On Vista the same task with the > same hard drive runs smoothly, while going back to an XP machine shows > the same slow behaviou

Re: (Synchronization among clients with history)

2009-01-12 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Sat, 2009-01-10 at 15:01 -0600, Jeff Allen wrote: > I'm looking to build a rough implementation of a multi-client > rdiff-backup system; in order to do this I'm using rsync before > rdiff-backup. > > (We'll say there's a server, Client A, and Client B. Files should be > synced between A and B

Re: webdav timeout

2009-01-12 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Sat, 2009-01-10 at 18:16 +0100, Kraak Helge wrote: > I tried to sync two files (50 MB and 100 MB) with my webdav folder > using rsync 3.0.5 with Mac OS X (10.4.11) Terminal and X11. With the > Terminal application the sync always failed with both files. With X11 > I once was successful s

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6025] 0 files to consider should not return code 23

2009-01-12 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6025 m...@mattmccutchen.net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

Rsync crash

2009-01-12 Thread Maxence DUNNEWIND
Hello, I'm using an rsync server on a Linux packages repository (deb packages) to sync all mirrors. The mirrors sync every 10 minutes. Most of the time, there is nothing to sync, except a timestamp file, so the sync is pretty fast. Anyway, after it has been working well for some time (between 2 a

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6025] New: 0 files to consider should not return code 23

2009-01-12 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6025 Summary: 0 files to consider should not return code 23 Product: rsync Version: 2.6.9 Platform: x86 URL: http://www.paguito.com OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Sever

Re: rsync to fat32 on different platforms

2009-01-12 Thread Andreas Nef
Only one additional remark so far: The problem seems to be connected to Windows XP (tested SP 3 so far). On Vista the same task with the same hard drive runs smoothly, while going back to an XP machine shows the same slow behaviour again. Andi Am 12.01.2009 um 02:34 schrieb Daniel: