Re: Rsync from a third host?

2008-11-02 Thread Wayne Davison
On Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 09:39:05PM -0800, kbrault wrote: > insecure -e option not allowed. > This account is restricted by rssh. You should fix or replace rssh. See a prior thread where I posted a patch to fix the silly command-checking of rssh. If all rssh allows in is rsync, see the support/r

Re: Thorough distributed backup/sync strategy

2008-11-02 Thread Henri S
LBackup probably will meet your needs. Also, Link-Backup may come close. Hope this helps. Disclaimer: I am a developer on the LBackup project. Matthew Monaco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >Does anyone have a good distributed backup strategy? I've been revising >mine for a year or so now and a

Re: Rsync from a third host?

2008-11-02 Thread kbrault
I do prefer to get the Host-B to Host-C working. When I enter "rsync -navze ssh /test [EMAIL PROTECTED]:" in a shell I am first prompted to accept the key, then I am asked to enter the password for Host-C and then I get: insecure -e option not allowed. This account is restricted by rssh. Allow

Re: [PATCH] Make progress output show "done" instead of "to-chk".

2008-11-02 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Sun, 2008-11-02 at 21:02 -0800, Wayne Davison wrote: > On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 02:05:43AM -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote: > > In incremental recursion mode, the number of files "to check" can > > increase (when new file-list chunks are built) as well as decrease, > > which I found confusing to watc

Re: Rsync from a third host?

2008-11-02 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Sun, 2008-11-02 at 20:50 -0800, kbrault wrote: > Host-C: External Backup host. Only has rsync daemon available to us via > RSSH. SFTP but no shell or cron. OpenSSH 4.3. Debian Linux > Host-B: Our server. Has OpenSSh 3.9 (for now). Centos 4.5 Linux > Host-A: External Web host. Has cron, shell, rs

Re: [PATCH] Make progress output show "done" instead of "to-chk".

2008-11-02 Thread Wayne Davison
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 02:05:43AM -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote: > In incremental recursion mode, the number of files "to check" can > increase (when new file-list chunks are built) as well as decrease, > which I found confusing to watch. This patch makes the progress line > show the number of file

Re: Rsync from a third host?

2008-11-02 Thread kbrault
Thank you for the quick response. Here is were we are Host-C: External Backup host. Only has rsync daemon available to us via RSSH. SFTP but no shell or cron. OpenSSH 4.3. Debian Linux Host-B: Our server. Has OpenSSh 3.9 (for now). Centos 4.5 Linux Host-A: External Web host. Has cron, shell,

Re: Rsync from a third host?

2008-11-02 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Sun, 2008-11-02 at 20:15 -0800, kbrault wrote: > If I have three computers (Host-A, Host-B and Host-C) is it possible to > execute Rsync from Host-A and use the rsync daemon via SSH on Host-B as the > source and the rsync daemon via SSH on host-C as the destination? No, rsync does not supp

Rsync from a third host?

2008-11-02 Thread kbrault
Hello everyone, If I have three computers (Host-A, Host-B and Host-C) is it possible to execute Rsync from Host-A and use the rsync daemon via SSH on Host-B as the source and the rsync daemon via SSH on host-C as the destination? Thank you in advance for your help. Kevin -- View this mess

Re: rsync protection filter for backed-up files

2008-11-02 Thread Jacob Balazer
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 8:23 PM, Matt McCutchen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 2008-11-01 at 14:43 -0700, Jacob Balazer wrote: >> I'm trying to have rsync keep backups of changed and deleted files. >> Following the examples in the man page, I've set the backup suffix and >> created a protectio

feature suggestion: no-backup filter modifier

2008-11-02 Thread Matthew Monaco
I think a modifier for filter rules that inhibits the --backup option for the particular line might be useful. for example I could have --filter='H,nb /.mozilla/firefox/x.default/Cache' or I could have --filter'+ /Documents' --filter'+,nb /.mozilla' (So my documents will be backed up to --b

Re: Problem with extended ACLs in 3.0.4?

2008-11-02 Thread Andrew Gideon
On Sun, 02 Nov 2008 16:10:23 -0500, Matt McCutchen wrote: [...] > I > guess one could still make the argument that the ACLs should be copied > exactly. That would be my assertion. Regardless of the reason for the mask being present - added by the user or required by the file system - the defaul

Re: Problem with extended ACLs in 3.0.4?

2008-11-02 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Sun, 2008-11-02 at 20:48 +, Andrew Gideon wrote: > As you'll see below, -A yields the same results: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] t]# getfacl f1 f2 > # file: f1 > # owner: adm > # group: sys > user::r-x > group::r-x > mask::r-x > other::r-x >

Re: Problem with extended ACLs in 3.0.4?

2008-11-02 Thread Andrew Gideon
On Sun, 02 Nov 2008 15:33:05 -0500, Matt McCutchen wrote: > You need to pass -A to preserve ACLs. -X does not process "system.*" > extended attributes. Sorry. I actually [think I] know that, but copied the wrong test. As you'll see below, -A yields the same results: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Problem with extended ACLs in 3.0.4?

2008-11-02 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Sun, 2008-11-02 at 19:18 +, Andrew Gideon wrote: > This one seems pretty basic. It's on a CentOS 4.5 machine with rsync rpm > rsync-3.0.4-1.el4.rf and kernel 2.6.9-55.0.2.plus.c4. After the > operation, f1 and f2 should have identical ACLs. They don't. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] t]# rsy

Problem with extended ACLs in 3.0.4?

2008-11-02 Thread Andrew Gideon
I've been using a 2.6.2 that I modified myself to get ACLs as I like. I'm trying now to get back into the public version of rsync, but am finding difficulties. This one seems pretty basic. It's on a CentOS 4.5 machine with rsync rpm rsync-3.0.4-1.el4.rf and kernel 2.6.9-55.0.2.plus.c4. After

Re: exclude vs hide

2008-11-02 Thread Michal Soltys
Matthew Monaco wrote: What is the difference between exclude and hide in the filter rules? Normally, 'hide' is interpreted only by the sender and the files will never show up in the file list sent to the receiver. 'Exclude' is both 'hide' (sender) and 'protect' (receiver) - so files that will

exclude vs hide

2008-11-02 Thread Matthew Monaco
What is the difference between exclude and hide in the filter rules? -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.htm

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5867] New: rsync with ACLs resets mtime on targets

2008-11-02 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5867 Summary: rsync with ACLs resets mtime on targets Product: rsync Version: 3.0.4 Platform: x86 OS/Version: FreeBSD Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Com