On Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 09:39:05PM -0800, kbrault wrote:
> insecure -e option not allowed.
> This account is restricted by rssh.
You should fix or replace rssh. See a prior thread where I posted a
patch to fix the silly command-checking of rssh. If all rssh allows
in is rsync, see the support/r
LBackup probably will meet your needs.
Also, Link-Backup may come close.
Hope this helps.
Disclaimer: I am a developer on the LBackup project.
Matthew Monaco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Does anyone have a good distributed backup strategy? I've been revising
>mine for a year or so now and a
I do prefer to get the Host-B to Host-C working.
When I enter "rsync -navze ssh /test [EMAIL PROTECTED]:" in a shell I am first
prompted to accept the key, then I am asked to enter the password for Host-C
and then I get:
insecure -e option not allowed.
This account is restricted by rssh.
Allow
On Sun, 2008-11-02 at 21:02 -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 02:05:43AM -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> > In incremental recursion mode, the number of files "to check" can
> > increase (when new file-list chunks are built) as well as decrease,
> > which I found confusing to watc
On Sun, 2008-11-02 at 20:50 -0800, kbrault wrote:
> Host-C: External Backup host. Only has rsync daemon available to us via
> RSSH. SFTP but no shell or cron. OpenSSH 4.3. Debian Linux
> Host-B: Our server. Has OpenSSh 3.9 (for now). Centos 4.5 Linux
> Host-A: External Web host. Has cron, shell, rs
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 02:05:43AM -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> In incremental recursion mode, the number of files "to check" can
> increase (when new file-list chunks are built) as well as decrease,
> which I found confusing to watch. This patch makes the progress line
> show the number of file
Thank you for the quick response.
Here is were we are
Host-C: External Backup host. Only has rsync daemon available to us via
RSSH. SFTP but no shell or cron. OpenSSH 4.3. Debian Linux
Host-B: Our server. Has OpenSSh 3.9 (for now). Centos 4.5 Linux
Host-A: External Web host. Has cron, shell,
On Sun, 2008-11-02 at 20:15 -0800, kbrault wrote:
> If I have three computers (Host-A, Host-B and Host-C) is it possible to
> execute Rsync from Host-A and use the rsync daemon via SSH on Host-B as the
> source and the rsync daemon via SSH on host-C as the destination?
No, rsync does not supp
Hello everyone,
If I have three computers (Host-A, Host-B and Host-C) is it possible to
execute Rsync from Host-A and use the rsync daemon via SSH on Host-B as the
source and the rsync daemon via SSH on host-C as the destination?
Thank you in advance for your help.
Kevin
--
View this mess
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 8:23 PM, Matt McCutchen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-11-01 at 14:43 -0700, Jacob Balazer wrote:
>> I'm trying to have rsync keep backups of changed and deleted files.
>> Following the examples in the man page, I've set the backup suffix and
>> created a protectio
I think a modifier for filter rules that inhibits the --backup option
for the particular line might be useful.
for example I could have
--filter='H,nb /.mozilla/firefox/x.default/Cache'
or I could have
--filter'+ /Documents'
--filter'+,nb /.mozilla'
(So my documents will be backed up to --b
On Sun, 02 Nov 2008 16:10:23 -0500, Matt McCutchen wrote:
[...]
> I
> guess one could still make the argument that the ACLs should be copied
> exactly.
That would be my assertion. Regardless of the reason for the mask being
present - added by the user or required by the file system - the defaul
On Sun, 2008-11-02 at 20:48 +, Andrew Gideon wrote:
> As you'll see below, -A yields the same results:
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] t]# getfacl f1 f2
> # file: f1
> # owner: adm
> # group: sys
> user::r-x
> group::r-x
> mask::r-x
> other::r-x
>
On Sun, 02 Nov 2008 15:33:05 -0500, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> You need to pass -A to preserve ACLs. -X does not process "system.*"
> extended attributes.
Sorry. I actually [think I] know that, but copied the wrong test.
As you'll see below, -A yields the same results:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 2008-11-02 at 19:18 +, Andrew Gideon wrote:
> This one seems pretty basic. It's on a CentOS 4.5 machine with rsync rpm
> rsync-3.0.4-1.el4.rf and kernel 2.6.9-55.0.2.plus.c4. After the
> operation, f1 and f2 should have identical ACLs. They don't.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] t]# rsy
I've been using a 2.6.2 that I modified myself to get ACLs as I like.
I'm trying now to get back into the public version of rsync, but am
finding difficulties.
This one seems pretty basic. It's on a CentOS 4.5 machine with rsync rpm
rsync-3.0.4-1.el4.rf and kernel 2.6.9-55.0.2.plus.c4. After
Matthew Monaco wrote:
What is the difference between exclude and hide in the filter rules?
Normally, 'hide' is interpreted only by the sender and the files will
never show up in the file list sent to the receiver. 'Exclude' is both
'hide' (sender) and 'protect' (receiver) - so files that will
What is the difference between exclude and hide in the filter rules?
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.htm
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5867
Summary: rsync with ACLs resets mtime on targets
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.4
Platform: x86
OS/Version: FreeBSD
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Com
19 matches
Mail list logo