Hello Paul,
here is the status of the transfer.
If I understand it right, about 3% of the data was changed (literal data
against matched data). It took about 1h40min to transfer ~250MB of data.
But to be honest, I do not get a real clue out of this status report.
E.g. Laptop_D_10GB.vdi takes ar
On Aug 20, 2008, at 10:32 AM, "Carney Mimms"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This may not be an rsync-specific question, but it is certainly
stopping me
from moving forward with rsync and I am sure it has a simple
solution. I
have written a simple shell script to rsync disks attached to a Mac
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 10:32:23AM -0400, Carney Mimms wrote:
> COMMAND="sudo /usr/local/bin/rsync $OPTS $EXCLUDES $DIRS $BACKUPDIR"
That's a sudo issue, since sudo runs the command and splits the args on
spaces. You need to either add extra backslashes (\\\ for every \), add
extra quoting (e.g.
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 05:28:43PM +0200, Rob klein Gunnewiek wrote:
> ERROR: out of memory in flist_expand [generator]
With -vv, you should be seeing messages like this:
[generator] expand file_list pointer array to N bytes, did move
That will tell you what the last realloc attempt was before t
This may not be an rsync-specific question, but it is certainly stopping me
from moving forward with rsync and I am sure it has a simple solution. I
have written a simple shell script to rsync disks attached to a Mac OS X
Server 10.4.11 Xserve box at our offices to a similar Mac OS X Server
10.4.11
Some background: I have been assigned a task to implement one-way
synchronization of a large file storage to another box. The problem is
that on the target box a special directory has to be maintained in which
symlinks to received files should be created using special logic.
After some experim
Could someone please help me with this problem?
Rob klein Gunnewiek wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I get the following error using rsync 3.0.3 (both sides):
>
> ...
> data//admin_docs/2/8/9/9/0/7/9/msg-75682-748.msg is uptodate
> data//admin_docs/2/8/9/9/0/8/0/msg-75682-749.txt i
On Wed 20 Aug 2008, Peter P GMX wrote:
> Hallo Paul,
please keep replies to list messages on the list, others may also be
able to help.
> here is the call and the protocol for the transfer of one file. For me
> it seems that the whole file is transferred, right?
Nothing in the output indicate