Re: Does rsync 2.6.9 works for resource forks in Mac OS X

2008-05-17 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Sun, 2008-05-18 at 02:35 +, JanakiRam wrote: > I've downloaded the rsync 2.6.9 version and using it to perform backup > to my server. My doubt is when i try to copy a file Does rsync is > capable of copying the resource forks of that files as well ? Since version 10.4, the Mac OS X filesyst

Re: rsync --files-from option file with a custom Delimiter

2008-05-17 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Sun, 2008-05-18 at 02:35 +, JanakiRam wrote: > I'm new to rsync usage in Mac OS X. I'm having a strange issue with -- > files-from option. > > I'm providing the --files-from to provide a file , which contains the > list of files separated by newline character , to perform backup > operation

rsync --files-from option file with a custom Delimiter

2008-05-17 Thread JanakiRam
Hi All, I'm new to rsync usage in Mac OS X. I'm having a strange issue with -- files-from option. I'm providing the --files-from to provide a file , which contains the list of files separated by newline character , to perform backup operation. Especially in Mac OS X , particular tiff bundle file

Does rsync 2.6.9 works for resource forks in Mac OS X

2008-05-17 Thread JanakiRam
HI All, I'm new to this rsync world. Please bear with me if it looks odd. I've downloaded the rsync 2.6.9 version and using it to perform backup to my server. My doubt is when i try to copy a file Does rsync is capable of copying the resource forks of that files as well ? Please advise. Thanks

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5470] Make check failures on Solaris 10 with rsync 3.0.3pre2

2008-05-17 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5470 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5473] OS-X Leopard Rsync 3.0.3pre2 make check failures

2008-05-17 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5473 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5470] Make check failures on Solaris 10 with rsync 3.0.3pre2

2008-05-17 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5470 --- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-17 16:50 CST --- *** Bug 5473 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5470] Make check failures on Solaris 10 with rsync 3.0.3pre2

2008-05-17 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5470 --- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-17 16:49 CST --- *** Bug 5472 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5472] FreeBSD 3.0.3pre2 'make check' failures

2008-05-17 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5472 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5473] New: OS-X Leopard Rsync 3.0.3pre2 make check failures

2008-05-17 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5473 Summary: OS-X Leopard Rsync 3.0.3pre2 make check failures Product: rsync Version: 3.0.3 Platform: Other OS/Version: SunOS Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5472] New: FreeBSD 3.0.3pre2 'make check' failures

2008-05-17 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5472 Summary: FreeBSD 3.0.3pre2 'make check' failures Product: rsync Version: 3.0.3 Platform: Other OS/Version: FreeBSD Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 C

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5471] New: Rsync 3.0.3pre2 announcement fails to provide location of rsync home page.

2008-05-17 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5471 Summary: Rsync 3.0.3pre2 announcement fails to provide location of rsync home page. Product: rsync Version: 3.0.3 Platform: Other OS/Version: SunOS Status: NEW

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5470] New: Make check failures on Solaris 10 with rsync 3.0.3pre2

2008-05-17 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5470 Summary: Make check failures on Solaris 10 with rsync 3.0.3pre2 Product: rsync Version: 3.0.3 Platform: Other OS/Version: SunOS Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority:

Rsync 3.0.3pre2 released

2008-05-17 Thread Wayne Davison
I have made rsync 3.0.3pre2 available for release testing. This is another bug-fix release, with the only "enhancements" being made to the manpages and the testsuite. These are the changes that have happened since 3.0.3pre1: - Fixed the combination of --xattrs and --backup. - Fixed several pl

Re: Atomic operations in rsync

2008-05-17 Thread Wayne Davison
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 03:47:51PM -0700, shmerl wrote: > I.e. I use it like this: rsync --delay-updates --remove-source-files $1 $2 > > My question is, what happenes first - does the file appear in destination > (i.e. mv from ~tmp~ to dest), and then removed at the source host, or it is > first r

Unsubscription

2008-05-17 Thread Mac User FR
Hello all, I've started a MacOS 10.3 Panther xattr project at the begin of the year. There is already some time that I haven't presented a new version of rsync10.3xattr_support patch. By this mail I would like to present my apologies and officially stop this project for many reasons: - I'

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5365] --backup and --xattrs are not compatible

2008-05-17 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5365 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

Re: 3.0.2: make_bak_dir mkdir ...: File exists (17)

2008-05-17 Thread Wayne Davison
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 12:07:47PM -0500, Jordan Russell wrote: > rsync: make_bak_dir mkdir "/backup/server/../server-before-5/var" failed: > File exists (17) > rsync: keep_backup failed: "/backup/server/var/lib/rpcbind/rpcbind.file" -> > "../server-before-5/var/lib/rpcbind/rpcbind.file": Success

Re: Status of --ignorcase option in main tree/build?

2008-05-17 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Sat, 2008-05-17 at 01:32 -0400, Aaron Davies wrote: > How does this work on OS X/HFS+ (case-preserving, but > case-insensitive)? Any issues with the standard build in a mixed-OS > scenario like this? The standard version should work mostly fine on a case-insensitive, case-preserving filesystem.