DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4561] Add options --tweak, --no-tweak, --no-tweak-hlinked

2008-03-17 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4561 --- Comment #4 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-17 22:14 CST --- I have posted a revised version of the patch that covers non-regular files and has slightly improved documentation in branch "tweak-opts" of my repository at: http://mattmcc

[PATCH] Attempt to rewrite the description of the filter parameters in rsyncd.conf.yo.

2008-03-17 Thread Matt McCutchen
- Collect material that applies to all daemon filters in the documentation of the "filter" parameter, and make it more complete and coherent. - Amplify the recommendation to exclude entire subtrees properly since the excluded_below check is easy to circumvent and I have proposed removing it a

Re: Incremental file updates over a network, NFS?

2008-03-17 Thread Andy Smith
Ok, well really thanks for being so helpful! All working now! For the record Im transfering 2Gb of RRD DB files and with rsync daemon over ssh I've cut sync times by about half and the "speedup" value I have is about 80. Not bad but I think I have a disk IO bottleneck preventing it being better

Re: AW: rsync Windows UNC

2008-03-17 Thread Matt McCutchen
Stefan, Please keep this on the list (CC rsync@lists.samba.org ). On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 17:33 +0100, Kalb Stefan wrote: > I corrected the path to: > > [nspPR53_so2] > path = //172.21.87.9/nspPR53_so/material/doc > read only = true > transfer logging = yes > > But no success. > Error message rem

Re: Incremental file updates over a network, NFS?

2008-03-17 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 18:33 +0100, Andy Smith wrote: > Once last point, does it make any difference if I push or pull from the > server side? Im thinking > the only important thing is if you pull you can set the server side > read-only which is better for > security, that about right?? Yes, that

Re: Incremental file updates over a network, NFS?

2008-03-17 Thread Andy Smith
Great thnx! No prob to reinstate the forced command in authorized_keys with explicit conf= Ooof, hurt my head working out that I had to put "use chroot = no" if Im not using root! lol But at last its all working!! Thanks alot for all the assistance!! Once last point, does it make any difference

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5287] FreeBSD pre10 compilation warnings report

2008-03-17 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5287 --- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-17 12:00 CST --- As I alluded to in my prior comment, I did some work to silence the "unused parameter" warnings. They should be gone on any compiler that supports the -Wno-unused-parameter

Re: Incremental file updates over a network, NFS?

2008-03-17 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 17:48 +0100, Andy Smith wrote: > I've tried implementing this but Im getting a nasty issue, rsync is core > dumping on the recieving server (the daemon > side). Alas, there's a bug in rsync 3.0.0: a daemon crashes unless it is given an explicit --config=FILE option. Either

Re: Incremental file updates over a network, NFS?

2008-03-17 Thread Andy Smith
Ok thanks for that! I've tried implementing this but Im getting a nasty issue, rsync is core dumping on the recieving server (the daemon side). Im running this command: /usr/local/bin/rsync -vv -r -e "ssh -vv -l rsync -i /usr/home/rsync/.ssh/id_dsa" /usr/home/rsync/rra/ bkupsrv::confidential

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5299] 2.6.9 client cannot receive files from 3.0.0 server

2008-03-17 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5299 --- Comment #4 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-17 11:15 CST --- I'm still working on coming up with a set of files that I can share with you that will reproduce the problem. So far I have only seen this happen with my VMware files for my

Re: Making rsync compile under Mac OS X 10.3.9 with extended attributes

2008-03-17 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Sat, 2008-02-23 at 12:35 +0100, Vitorio Machado wrote: > There is still a strange little bug: > Running > sudo ./rsync -aHXN --fileflags /Volumes/Src > /Volumes/Dst/80-rsync-test > for the first time gives an error > rsync: failed to set times on > "/Volumes/Dst/80-rsync-test/Src/60-bsd-fl

Re: Over-writing symlinks

2008-03-17 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 14:39 -0500, Matt McCutchen wrote: > It looks like --ignore-existing is currently implemented to apply only > to regular files. I think it was intended to apply to all > non-directories; certainly that is necessary if it is to prevent > undesired tweaking when a --link-dest r

Re: --ignore-existing not as expected

2008-03-17 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Fri, 2008-02-22 at 17:14 -0500, Matt McCutchen wrote: > On Fri, 2008-02-22 at 14:19 +0100, Lasse Kliemann wrote: > > Is this correct behavior? > > > > File `foo' gets overwritten with directory `foo', > > even though --ignore-existing is given. > > I had never thought about this case, but pro

[PATCH] Fix typo in rsyncd.conf man page.

2008-03-17 Thread Matt McCutchen
--- rsyncd.conf.yo |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/rsyncd.conf.yo b/rsyncd.conf.yo index f365333..f17e3d5 100644 --- a/rsyncd.conf.yo +++ b/rsyncd.conf.yo @@ -456,7 +456,7 @@ tt(fe80::%link1/:::::)nl() ) You can also combine "hosts

Re: rsync Windows UNC

2008-03-17 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 15:57 +0100, Kalb Stefan wrote: > I try to backup files from a NAS to our backup-server using rsync. > The NAS itself is not able to run rsync. > Therefore I installed rsyncd (cwrsync 2.1.1) on a windowsserver which > has access to the NAS. > I configured the rsyncd like this:

rsync Windows UNC

2008-03-17 Thread Kalb Stefan
Hello, I try to backup files from a NAS to our backup-server using rsync. The NAS itself is not able to run rsync. Therefore I installed rsyncd (cwrsync 2.1.1) on a windowsserver which has access to the NAS. I configured the rsyncd like this: [nspPR53_so2] path = /172.21.87.9/nspPR53_so/materia

Re: Incremental file updates over a network, NFS?

2008-03-17 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 12:24 +0100, Andy Smith wrote: > ok so basically that would (invoke with SETUID) be to invoke rsync daemon > as root for example? More > or less I have to run the daemon as root to be able to update files for all > users dont I? For example if I want > to rsync the homedirs

Re: Suggestions for basic rsync configuration

2008-03-17 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 05:58 -0700, Peter Heiss wrote: > hosts allow = trusted.hosts BTW, the "hosts allow" field needs to contain the actual list of trusted hosts, not the name of a file holding the list. Matt -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync

Re: Suggestions for basic rsync configuration

2008-03-17 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 05:58 -0700, Peter Heiss wrote: > Although, I am still having problems with > the daemon on the remote server. I ran the command "rsync --daemon" on the > remote server, no error there. But then I ran the following error to do a > test backup and received this error: > > # rs

Re: Suggestions for basic rsync configuration

2008-03-17 Thread Peter Heiss
 Matt McCutchen-7 wrote: > >>OK, let's be clear here. If you want to start a daemon to accept >>connections, the command is "rsync --daemon"; pass a --config=FILE >>option if you want to use a configuration file other than the >>default /etc/rsyncd.conf . If you want to access an rsync daemon,

Re: Incremental file updates over a network, NFS?

2008-03-17 Thread Andy Smith
Hi, ok so basically that would (invoke with SETUID) be to invoke rsync daemon as root for example? More or less I have to run the daemon as root to be able to update files for all users dont I? For example if I want to rsync the homedirs area, I have to run the deamon as root or run a seperat