DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5296] Failed to create rounding.h!

2008-03-15 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5296 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5296] Failed to create rounding.h!

2008-03-15 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5296 --- Comment #5 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-15 15:03 CST --- On my system, I have /usr/local/include/iconv.h (FreeBSD convention for non-BSD code) and I did supply CPPFLAGS="-I/usr/local/include" to configure. It seems that the bug is

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5296] Failed to create rounding.h!

2008-03-15 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5296 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|WORKSFORME

Re: Incremental file updates over a network, NFS?

2008-03-15 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Sat, 2008-03-15 at 19:32 +0100, Andy Smith wrote: > > If you don't want to touch the server user's authorized_keys file, you > > could have a separate user accept the ssh logins and either invoke the > > daemon via setuid/sudo or connect to a background daemon on the same > > machine (which work

Re: Incremental file updates over a network, NFS?

2008-03-15 Thread Andy Smith
Hey Matt, thanks a lot for your detailed and very helpful responces! I must admit Ive never come across the ssh force command option before and with this suddenly I feel much more comfortable with the solution! Probably that will work well for me, tho I'd like to understand the other part of

Re: Incremental file updates over a network, NFS?

2008-03-15 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Fri, 2008-03-14 at 15:00 +0100, Andy Smith wrote: > Ok, thanks for the info. That seems to open up the issue of network > security (yes NFS security normally isnt great, but...) > > rsyncd native: is this bug free and secure (based on > hosts_allow/hosts_deny?), perhaps a good solution with tc

Re: Incremental file updates over a network, NFS?

2008-03-15 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Fri, 2008-03-14 at 12:46 +0100, Andy Smith wrote: > can anyone point me at some consise info on when rsync is capable of > performing incremental updates > of binary files? I need to rsync over a network, and currently I have > this over an NFS share but I suppose > that even if binary updates

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5263] failure to report deleted files with link-dest

2008-03-15 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5263 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #3 from [EM

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5223] Options to limit --one-file-system at the source or destination.

2008-03-15 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5223 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from [EM

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5324] Reduce the performance penalty of --xattrs on Mac OS X

2008-03-15 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5324 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from [EM

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5296] Failed to create rounding.h!

2008-03-15 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5296 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|blocker |normal Status|ASSIGNED

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5309] double free or corruption while using rsync 3.0.0 stable

2008-03-15 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5309 --- Comment #4 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-15 02:48 CST --- Created an attachment (id=3174) --> (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=3174&action=view) Fixed a crash bug in the backup code This patch allocate room for a dir'

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5309] double free or corruption while using rsync 3.0.0 stable

2008-03-15 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5309 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|