On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 06:20:21PM +0100, Paul Slootman wrote:
> The other issue in the bug report is something else, but as that happens
> when using 3.0.0 going to the 2.6.8 version running at rsync.net
It sounds like they're running something like the support/rrsync
validation script, which rem
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 12:21:01PM +0100, Lasse Kliemann wrote:
> 'rsync -a' updates the ctime on a directory even if no file in that directory
> has changed.
Earlier rsyncs always did an extra stat() prior to setting the time, so
I've restored that behavior. The attached patch fixes this.
..wa
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5301
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5297
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5297
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Summary|merge test
Ok, long story short I have tried and tried to get a solution that I feel
comfortable with. I'm after an effective RAID1, but the cheap ass
PCI-IDE-RAID card I had originally would refuse to see a HDD. I since got a
nicer adaptec one, same problem so I now see a problem with HDD instead off
PCI-
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 06:25:12PM -0500, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> Wayne, this brings up a good point. It would be nice if each source
> package had a "persistent" URL that worked whether or not the version is
> the latest
Yeah, that's a good idea. I've organized the source (including the
latest
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 07:07:07PM +0100, Paul Slootman wrote:
> If rsync is called with -4 or -6, that option is currently ignored when
> ssh is used as the transport.
That's because those options are only used when opening a socket. The
user should configure ssh on their own. I'd suggest that
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 10:40:26AM -0600, Mike Bombich wrote:
> but this entire chunk of the that original diff file was lost:
Generated files are not included in the repository or its patches. They
are only included in the release tar. Those accessing the developer
source are expected to have t
On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 22:56 +, Tom May wrote:
> I noticed you've made rsync 3.0.0 available at
> http://www.samba.org/ftp/rsync/rsync-3.0.0.tar.gz, which is great!
>
> However, until it's upgraded (if ever), the buildroot system I'm using to
> build
> embedded linux tries to download rsync 2.
I noticed you've made rsync 3.0.0 available at
http://www.samba.org/ftp/rsync/rsync-3.0.0.tar.gz, which is great!
However, until it's upgraded (if ever), the buildroot system I'm using to build
embedded linux tries to download rsync 2.6.9 from
http://www.samba.org/ftp/rsync/rsync-2.6.9.tar.gz, whi
If rsync is called with -4 or -6, that option is currently ignored when
ssh is used as the transport. The attached patch is a stab at passing
the option on to the ssh process. It checks that the remote shell
program is something that looks like ssh. Perhaps that could be done
cleaner...
Paul Slo
Hi,
I am using probably your port of rsync in Novell Netware environment
(v. 2.6.6, I think), it helps us very much. Do you plan to make port
of version 3, too?
Kind regards,
Karel Rys, CZ
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, r
On Mon 03 Mar 2008, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 01:50:28PM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:
> > I'll fix the NULL and look to get a test for this added.
>
> The git repository has both the fix and the extended test.
>
> Attached is just the NULL-pointer fix.
Confirmed that it now w
Looking at http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/patches/fileflags.diff --
It looks like the changes from fileflags-fixes.diff patch were applied
to the patch from http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/rsync-patches-3.0.0.tar.gz
, but this entire chunk of the that original diff file was lost:
diff -
'rsync -a' updates the ctime on a directory even if no file in that directory
has changed. A kind of workaround is to use '-O', but then the mtimes of
directories are not preserved.
(Usage example where this is important: maintain a copy of filesystem A in
filesystem B, and use filesystem B as
I don't know if this is the propper place to ask for new funcionality, but
after searching the website i didn't find another place to do it.
I'm very sorry if I`m asking this in the wrong place.
It would be greatful to have crypting funcionality added to rsync, appart
from using ssh to crypt trans
17 matches
Mail list logo
