Hi,
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 05:36 +0100, Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:
> > On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > On Friday 25 January 2008, Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Sylvain Gargasson wrote:
> > > > > sho-lnx-001:~ #
On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 05:36 +0100, Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Friday 25 January 2008, Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:
> > > On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Sylvain Gargasson wrote:
> > > > sho-lnx-001:~ # rsync -av --progress --stats /mnt/source/*
> > > > /mnt/de
Hi,
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Friday 25 January 2008, Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:
> > On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Sylvain Gargasson wrote:
> > > Thanks for my RAM problem, it's OK now, Dell share me 32GB of RAM.
> > >
> > > But now when I try on my showroom with a lot of files in on
On Friday 25 January 2008, Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Sylvain Gargasson wrote:
> > Thanks for my RAM problem, it's OK now, Dell share me 32GB of RAM.
> >
> > But now when I try on my showroom with a lot of files in one directory I
> > have this error:
> >
> > sho-lnx-001:~ #
On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 21:38 -0500, Robert DuToit wrote:
> I reinstalled developer tools again on OS10.3.2 and ran make again and
> this time and saw more action but a lot of errors such as the one
> mentioned by Vitorio:
>
> error: `ACL_TYPE_DEFAULT' undeclared (first use in this function)
Hi Again,
I reinstalled developer tools again on OS10.3.2 and ran make again and
this time and saw more action but a lot of errors such as the one
mentioned by Vitorio:
error: `ACL_TYPE_DEFAULT' undeclared (first use in this function)
Thanks, Rob D
Here is the whole output from make:
Hi all,
Somewhat along the same lines, I wanted to see if rsync 3 would work
on Mac OS10.3X so I made a test partition and installed 10.3.2 on it
( no updates around). I then installed xcode 1.5 and with a fresh copy
of rsync 3.0.0pre8 and tried ./configure which worked fine. When I
tried
Hi,
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Sylvain Gargasson wrote:
> Thanks for my RAM problem, it's OK now, Dell share me 32GB of RAM.
>
> But now when I try on my showroom with a lot of files in one directory I
> have this error:
>
> sho-lnx-001:~ # rsync -av --progress --stats /mnt/source/* /mnt/destination
On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 19:03 +0100, Sylvain Gargasson wrote:
> Thanks for my RAM problem, it’s OK now, Dell share me 32GB of RAM.
>
> But now when I try on my showroom with a lot of files in one directory
> I have this error:
>
> sho-lnx-001:~ # rsync -av --progress
> --stats /mnt/source/* /mnt/de
Hi all,
Thanks for my RAM problem, it's OK now, Dell share me 32GB of RAM.
But now when I try on my showroom with a lot of files in one directory I have
this error:
sho-lnx-001:~ # rsync -av --progress --stats /mnt/source/* /mnt/destination/
-bash: /usr/bin/rsync: Argument list too lo
Thanks Paul, understood.
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Slootman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2008 5:32 PM
Subject: Re: --partial and --delete
On Fri 25 Jan 2008, Julian Pace Ross wrote:
I need to use --partial (without using --partial-dir if possible).
If
On 25.01.2008 16:09, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 12:26 -0800, Robert Denton wrote:
> > I need my rsync to listen on port 8090 as well as on the standard
> > rsync port. Is this possible, and if so, how does one do this?
>
> A single background daemon can listen on only one port.
Hi,
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, chuang liu wrote:
> I use rsync to transfer multiple files from several clients to a server in
> parallel. I am wondering how many concurrent connections the server should
> handle to maximize the throughput (number of bytes written to server). In
> an extreme case, if on
On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 12:26 -0800, Robert Denton wrote:
> I need my rsync to listen on port 8090 as well as on the standard
> rsync port. Is this possible, and if so, how does one do this?
A single background daemon can listen on only one port. Just start two
separate daemons with configuration
Hi all,
I need my rsync to listen on port 8090 as well as on the standard rsync port.
Is this possible, and if so, how does one do this? Thanks!
Robert --
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart
On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 14:21 -0600, chuang liu wrote:
> Does rsyncd do any optimization for handling concurrent connections?
No. Concurrent connections are handled by completely independent server
processes.
Matt
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsyn
Hi:
I use rsync to transfer multiple files from several clients to a server in
parallel. I am wondering how many concurrent connections the server should
handle to maximize the throughput (number of bytes written to server). In
an extreme case, if only one connection allowed, the disk IO speed of
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 00:44:34 -0500, Matt McCutchen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-01-20 at 17:03 +0100, "Jürgen Fluk" wrote:
> > rsync 2.6.9 --link-dest does
> >
> > - not hardlink special files (symlink, device nodes)
> > This doesn't take much space, but it clutters the logfiles
> >
Le 24 janv. 08 à 16:30, Matt McCutchen a écrit :
On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 13:25 +0100, Vitorio Machado wrote:
Somebody knows if it's possible to compile rsync (version 3 would be
great, but can be 2.6.x) under Mac OS X 10.3.9 with extended
attributes?
I have tried to compile rsync from source b
On Fri 25 Jan 2008, Julian Pace Ross wrote:
>
> I need to use --partial (without using --partial-dir if possible).
> If --delete is also specified, does this cancel out the effect of --partial
> (since any previous partials are deleted before the transfers?) .. can;t
> seem to figure it out from
Hi all,
I need to use --partial (without using --partial-dir if possible).
If --delete is also specified, does this cancel out the effect of --partial
(since any previous partials are deleted before the transfers?) .. can;t
seem to figure it out from the man pages alone...
If this is so, will u
On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 11:34 +0100, Paul Slootman wrote:
> On Thu 24 Jan 2008, Matt McCutchen wrote:
>
> > > is it possible to change those error messages into a standard pattern?
> >
> > Yes, it would be possible, but it would require going through and
> > reformatting each of the 77 FERROR_XFER
On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 10:11 -0500, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> So just pass --iconv=utf8mac,iso885915 when the Mac is sending and
> --iconv=iso885915,utf8mac when it is receiving, and the problem should
> go away.
Just so the above doesn't confuse people in the future: I thought
incorrectly that the -
---
Adding a hint about iconv --list is a good idea. This patch does it.
Matt
rsync.yo |3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/rsync.yo b/rsync.yo
index 047e360..870993a 100644
--- a/rsync.yo
+++ b/rsync.yo
@@ -2015,7 +2015,8 @@ dit(bf(--iconv=CONVERT_SPEC)) R
On Thu 24 Jan 2008, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> > is it possible to change those error messages into a standard pattern?
>
> Yes, it would be possible, but it would require going through and
> reformatting each of the 77 FERROR_XFER messages individually and would
> make a few of them less readable (
25 matches
Mail list logo
