Re: --link-dest vs. special files and owner/group changes

2008-01-23 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Sun, 2008-01-20 at 17:03 +0100, "Jürgen Fluk" wrote: > rsync 2.6.9 --link-dest does > > - not hardlink special files (symlink, device nodes) > This doesn't take much space, but it clutters the logfiles > > - change owner/groupship on the hardlink > So if I use a hard-linked-tree-per-day, i

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5199] Exclusion of source arg ancestor short-circuits recursion

2008-01-23 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5199 --- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-23 23:33 CST --- IMHO, the old behavior of excluding just the implied dir from the file-list was useful, not weird...but anyway the important problem is fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5201] Rsync lets user corrupt dest by applying non-inplace batch in inplace mode

2008-01-23 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5201 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

Re: Thought on large files

2008-01-23 Thread Brendan Grieve
Matt McCutchen wrote: On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 13:54 +0900, Brendan Grieve wrote: I had a look at rdiff-backup, but I was trying to get something that spoke native rsync (IE, not to force any change on the client side). To achieve this, you can have the client push to an rs

Rsync iconv (Cygwin) (file has vanished)

2008-01-23 Thread Brendan Grieve
I have another question. I'm not sure if this is the correct post for cygwin rsync related questions. I've compiled rsync 3.0.0pre8 under cygwin. Works splendidly and compiles cleanly. I made sure to have libiconv installed and it supports the --iconv command (at least it accepts it). I've b

Re: Thought on large files

2008-01-23 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 13:54 +0900, Brendan Grieve wrote: > I had a look at rdiff-backup, but I was trying to get something that > spoke native rsync (IE, not to force any change on the client side). To achieve this, you can have the client push to an rsync daemon and then have the daemon call rdif

Re: Thought on large files

2008-01-23 Thread Brendan Grieve
Matt McCutchen wrote: On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 13:38 +0900, Brendan Grieve wrote: Lets say the file, whatever it is, is a 10Gb file, and that some small amount of data changes in it. This is efficiently sent accross by rsync, BUT the rsync server side will correctly break the hard-

Re: Rsync 3.0.0pre8 and Mac OS X

2008-01-23 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 16:01 +0100, Rudolf E. Reiber wrote: > I tried Rsync 3.0.0pre8 on my mac running os X 10.5. > > I was very pleased about the --iconv feature, as i have to sync some > LINUX-machines and I had really trouble with some filenames. > But I found one strange thing in connection

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5220] PATCH SUBMITTED: New Feature: stdio model for client

2008-01-23 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5220 --- Comment #3 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-23 10:59 CST --- (In reply to comment #2) > You can make rsync effectively use an existing fd by passing an > $RSYNC_CONNECT_PROG that refers to a program that shuttles data between its > std

Rsync 3.0.0pre8 and Mac OS X

2008-01-23 Thread Rudolf E. Reiber
Hi, I tried Rsync 3.0.0pre8 on my mac running os X 10.5. I was very pleased about the --iconv feature, as i have to sync some LINUX-machines and I had really trouble with some filenames. But I found one strange thing in connection with the mac. First of all, the translation between the LINUX