On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 21:22 -0500, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-12-16 at 13:47 -0500, Ming Zhang wrote:
> > > even code 24 is in order because the nonexistence of a --files-from
> > > entry cannot affect the correctness of a run with --delete in the way
> > > that a traditional vanishing ca
On Sun, 2007-12-16 at 13:47 -0500, Ming Zhang wrote:
> > even code 24 is in order because the nonexistence of a --files-from
> > entry cannot affect the correctness of a run with --delete in the way
> > that a traditional vanishing can.
>
> not quite understand what u meant here...
Sorry. I was
On Tue 18 Dec 2007, Tang, Clayton (Yiqi) wrote:
>
> Nevermind, I was able to find a large file and observe the rsync
> progress. It turns out rsync makes a remote file in the target directory
> with "." + original_file_name + some random letter as filename. Once the
> file is complete, rsync does
Hi all,
I want to run 2 rsync daemons on my system. Each has its own
configuration file, and they are listening on a specific port.
These 2 daemons are running perfectly but getting them started by 2 init
scripts is a bit more difficult.
The problem is that when stopping rsync you check the p
