Rsync 3.0.0pre5 released

2007-11-08 Thread Wayne Davison
I've just released rsync 3.0.0pre5, the latest pre-release version of the upcoming 3.0.0 release. Things are progressing well in our efforts to stamp out bugs for the final release. Please keep up the good work in testing this and sending email to the rsync mailing list with your questions, comme

Re: additional errors from 3.0.0pre4

2007-11-08 Thread Wayne Davison
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 02:35:48PM +0100, Daniel Maher wrote: > rsync: writefd_unbuffered failed to write 8 bytes [receiver]: Broken pipe (32) Are you using 3 or more -v options? If so, that should be fixed in the latest version. ..wayne.. -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samb

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4912] rsync crashes with a double free or corrupted memory detection in glibc

2007-11-08 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4912 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

problems with permissions on windows

2007-11-08 Thread Mojca Miklavec
Hello, I'm using cwRsync on windows (I've tried a few alternatives, like Delta for example, but all of them behave equally (bad) in my case - they set really weird permissions on binaries - I don't know which ones exactly, but binaries cannot be executed). I have a linux server with binaries for

Re: Bug or undesired behavior when quota exceeded

2007-11-08 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 18:36 +0100, Janusz Jurski wrote: > But it seems to me that this is against the description of the "partial" > option in rsync manual. > In my opinion, the partially > transferred file shall be kept for future reuse and shall not overwrite > the destination file. > Also,

Re: Bug or undesired behavior when quota exceeded

2007-11-08 Thread Janusz Jurski
On 2007-11-08 at 15:05, Matt McCutchen wrote: > On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 12:30 +0100, Janusz Jurski wrote: > > Any idea on how to avoid such a situation? > > The trouble is that you are passing --partial (-P = --partial > --progress), which makes the receiver in the first command move the > partially

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5064] compile error - SCO 5.0.6a

2007-11-08 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5064 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5064] compile error - SCO 5.0.6a

2007-11-08 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5064 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from [EM

Re: Bug or undesired behavior when quota exceeded

2007-11-08 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 12:30 +0100, Janusz Jurski wrote: > I have just noticed an undesired behavior when using rsync when disk > quota is exceeded. > 1) I normally execute two following commands to synchronize folders > between a local host and a remote host: > rsync -aCPvu --existing [EMAIL

additional errors from 3.0.0pre4

2007-11-08 Thread Daniel Maher
Hello all, While attempting to run an rsync backup of a remote server (the scenario i posted about a few days ago, in fact), i am occasionally receiving the following error: rsync: writefd_unbuffered failed to write 8 bytes [receiver]: Broken pipe (32) rsync error: error in rsync protocol data st

Bug or undesired behavior when quota exceeded

2007-11-08 Thread Janusz Jurski
Hi, I have just noticed an undesired behavior when using rsync when disk quota is exceeded. I do not know how to avoid it (or maybe it can be considered as a bug). The following is a scenario that leads to the undesired behavior: 1) I normally execute two following commands to synchronize fold