On Oct 15, 2007, at 1:55 AM, Wayne Davison wrote:
On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 08:14:57PM +0200, Wesley W. Terpstra wrote:
I've attached a patch which does this. Currently resource forks
and finder
info get placed into an extended attribute transparently by osx
(com.apple.{ResourceFork/FinderInfo})
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 12:30:34AM -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> In this situation, automatically disabling incremental recursion would
> be better than exiting with an error that really isn't the user's
> fault.
Yeah. I hadn't wanted to add an extra round-trip delay that would be
required by a
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 12:38:19PM +0200, Wesley W. Terpstra wrote:
> Someone with an intel mac should test this to check the uint32_t works
> there too (I have a powerpc).
It worked fine for a simple test.
The latest CVS code now has your lchmod() alternative if setattrlist()
is around. Thanks!
I've noticed the same thing...trying to change any of the timestamps
on a symlink
via setattrlist does nothing at all (not even complain).
On Oct 16, 2007, at 8:56 AM, Wesley W. Terpstra wrote:
Here's a patch that makes link permissions work when applied to
rsync CVS.
I am also trying to mak
On Mon, 2007-10-15 at 22:21 -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> On 10/15/07, Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is there a system call that allows their permissions to be changed
> > after they've been created? (Since lchmod is lacking.)
>
> I don't think so, but as Wesley hinted, one can ef
Here's a patch that makes link permissions work when applied to rsync
CVS.
I am also trying to make an lutimes alternative, but for whatever
reason setattrlist silently drops my changes.
lchmod-osx.patch
Description: Binary data
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/
Amazing no one else has written this... Someone with an intel mac
should test this to check the uint32_t works there too (I have a
powerpc).
#include
#include
#include
#include /* !!! */
#include
#include
int my_lchmod(const char *path, mode_t mode) {
struct attrlist attrList;
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4870
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|INVALID
Hello!
Please CC the list so people other than me can help you and so your
messages will be available to future users.
On 10/15/07, Mario Domgörgen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
No, i don't run the client side command myself. The backup should start
from the server, so i use the the second comm
