On 10/8/07, Mario Domgörgen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i'm trying to backup one of my hosts with a two rsync-scripts, which are
> mainly just calling on the client side
>
> /usr/bin/rsync --server --sender -vlogDtprz --delete-excluded
> --numeric-ids --exclude-from=/etc/sm-backup/rsync.exclude /
I'm not sure which but either an XP machine or a OSX machine is creating
those folders. I'll check out the script, it shouldn't be too hard to do.
_
Stephen Zemlicka
Integrated Computer Technologies
PH. 608-558-5926
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
On 10/11/07, Stephen Zemlicka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> XP Pro on both ends. This is the error in the log
>
> building file list ... file has vanished: "/cygdrive/F/Share/CP
> Art/M-P/M/McCullough Const."
> done
> IO error encountered -- skipping file deletion
I imagine that once a period gets
XP Pro on both ends. This is the error in the log
building file list ... file has vanished: "/cygdrive/F/Share/CP
Art/M-P/M/McCullough Const."
done
IO error encountered -- skipping file deletion
Once I go into cmd and rename the folder via the short name to "McCullough
Const", it works just fine
On 10/11/07, Stephen Zemlicka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm having a terrible time with one particular customer using rsync. Every
> once in awhile, they create a folder like "Jon Const." Rsync seems to have
> a terrible time with the period in the folder name. After the backup runs
> and fai
great!
Thanx very much!
Manuel
Matt McCutchen wrote:
> On 10/11/07, Manuel Kissoyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Using which Glibc version?
>>
>
> The one that is on my computer: Fedora's glibc-2.6-4 .
>
> If you want an RPM that works with the glibc on your servers, just
> rebuild
On 10/11/07, Manuel Kissoyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Using which Glibc version?
The one that is on my computer: Fedora's glibc-2.6-4 .
If you want an RPM that works with the glibc on your servers, just
rebuild my source RPM on one of the servers:
$ wget http://mattmccutchen.net/rpm/rsync-3.
Hi Matt,
Using which Glibc version?
Thanx
Manuel
Matt McCutchen wrote:
> On 10/11/07, Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I've just released rsync 3.0.0pre2, the second pre-release version for
>> the upcoming 3.0.0 release.
>>
>
> I have built RPMs (source and i386 binary) for
On 10/11/07, Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've just released rsync 3.0.0pre2, the second pre-release version for
> the upcoming 3.0.0 release.
I have built RPMs (source and i386 binary) for rsync 3.0.0pre2:
http://mattmccutchen.net/rsync/#rsync-packages
Matt
--
To unsubscribe or c
I've just released rsync 3.0.0pre2, the second pre-release version for
the upcoming 3.0.0 release.
Please test this out and email the rsync mailing list with any
questions, comments, bug reports, etc. Thanks!
You can download the tar file and its signature from here:
http://rsync.samba.org/
On 10/11/07, Frank Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks Matt again for the info. So now I'm feeling foolish. I tried to just
> pull the latest version of this from the cvs and I keep getting the following
> errors when I try to click onto 'download'.
Yes, the cvsweb seems to be broken; I h
Dear webmaster,
The "download" links in the cvsweb interface to the rsync source
repository (e.g., on
http://cvs.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/rsync/patches/detect-renamed.diff
) don't work. They give an error page similar to the one attached.
Please fix this.
Thanks,
Matt
Title: Error
âââââ
On 10/11/07, Manuel Kissoyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matt, any chance you do one compiled with glibc 2.3.x?
No, and I don't know of a way that I could make one without actually
installing glibc 2.3.x on my system, which would break everything.
Instead, you could rebuild my source RPM on your
Matt, any chance you do one compiled with glibc 2.3.x?
Thanx in advance!
Manuel
Matt McCutchen wrote:
> On 10/4/07, Manuel Kissoyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Wondering if there are somewhere to download an rpm version for centos?
>>
>
> My RPM will probably work fine on CentOS,
>wondering if the only option to have rsync 3 running is have a glibc 2.4+?
who is telling this?
sure you can`t run rsync on system with old glibc if it`s compiled on system
with newer glibc - but you can compile it agains old glibc
regards
roland
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von:
I did ask before but go no reply...here i go again to see if someone
copuld reply :-)
Thanx!
...
wondering if the only option to have rsync 3 running is have a glibc 2.4+?
I have a backup server and many other servers running cpanel on them so
a glibc update is not an option as it could skrew u
On 10/11/07, Frank Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks Matt for your reply. What my problem is, I didn't install rsync
> from source, but through a rpm package. I wonder if it is possible to
> apply the patch and re-create the rpm, to minimize the work involved.
Yes. Obtain the rsync sourc
I've started testing the detect-renamed patch with 2.6.9 and soon 3.0.0pre1. I
have an unique situation where I'm rsync'ing to a HSM based filesystem. I've
found that the detect-renamed patch works but it appears to do a copy of the
file to the new destination. This is particular slow since t
18 matches
Mail list logo
