Re: rsync error

2007-10-07 Thread Matt McCutchen
On 10/7/07, Stephen Zemlicka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Still seems to transfer all files. Funny thing is it seems to only do it > for the pictures folder. Please run rsync with -i and look at the output to see why it is transferring the files. Matt -- To unsubscribe or change options: https:

Re: Extremely poor rsync performance on very large files (near 100GB and larger)

2007-10-07 Thread Matt McCutchen
On 10/7/07, Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 10:16:01AM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote: > > And one final thought that occurred to me: it would also be possible > > for the sender to segment a really large file into several chunks, > > handling each one without overla

RE: rsync error

2007-10-07 Thread Stephen Zemlicka
Still seems to transfer all files. Funny thing is it seems to only do it for the pictures folder. _ Stephen Zemlicka Integrated Computer Technologies PH. 608-558-5926 E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: rsync error

2007-10-07 Thread Matt McCutchen
On 10/7/07, Stephen Zemlicka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Additionally, this backup contains about 100GB of photos. It seems to > backup each file every backup. Any ideas? Try --modify-window=1 . Matt -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before po

RE: rsync error

2007-10-07 Thread Stephen Zemlicka
I ran it again with no changes and it worked. Any ideas why it didn't run the few times I tried it earlier. Additionally, this backup contains about 100GB of photos. It seems to backup each file every backup. Any ideas? If I run the -c, it doesn't backup each file but it takes forever (over 1h

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5012] iconv: client charset used by server process

2007-10-07 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5012 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

Re: rsync error

2007-10-07 Thread Matt McCutchen
On 10/7/07, Stephen Zemlicka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm getting the attached error suddenly. I am using deltacopy for the ease > of setup and e-mail notifications. It is from a local disk to a USB drive. > I believe it's using rsync 2.6.6 > Executing: rsync.exe -v -rlt --delete "/cygdrive

rsync error

2007-10-07 Thread Stephen Zemlicka
I'm getting the attached error suddenly. I am using deltacopy for the ease of setup and e-mail notifications. It is from a local disk to a USB drive. I believe it's using rsync 2.6.6 _ Stephen Zemlicka Integrated Computer Technologies PH. 608-558-5926 E-Mail <

Re: compression of source and target files

2007-10-07 Thread reno
Kenneth Simpson wrote: Chuck Wolber wrote: On Fri, 21 Sep 2007, Kenneth Simpson wrote: Hi - there's a flag for rsync to compress the files in transit - is it possible to compress one side (target) with gzip and have rsync still work correctly? It'll still work correctly

Re: non-recursive remote listing breakage in 3.0.0pre1

2007-10-07 Thread Matt McCutchen
On 10/7/07, Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Actually, you were right. Turned out I just needed to limit the check > to when inc_recurse was active, as that is the only time that the > --no-implied-dirs code needs to include implied directories in the > recursion sequence, and thus the o

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5012] iconv: client charset used by server process

2007-10-07 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5012 --- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-10-07 12:07 CST --- Created an attachment (id=2938) --> (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=2938&action=view) truncate iconv_opt to target charset Added patch to truncate iconv_opt t

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5012] New: iconv: client charset used by server process

2007-10-07 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5012 Summary: iconv: client charset used by server process Product: rsync Version: 3.0.0 Platform: PPC OS/Version: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3

Re: Renaming a directory results in an expensive retransmission

2007-10-07 Thread N.J. van der Horn (Nico)
Thanks Matt, it seems that the last days there is a lot attention to this subject. My "pre-processor" approach helped a lot, but checksumming is very CPU-intensive. For that reason i sorted first on timestamp to determine which files would normally be deleted, thus minimizing the amount of files t

Re: Extremely poor rsync performance on very large files (near 100GB and larger)

2007-10-07 Thread Wayne Davison
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 10:16:01AM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote: > And one final thought that occurred to me: it would also be possible > for the sender to segment a really large file into several chunks, > handling each one without overlap, all without the generator or the > receiver knowing that i

Re: non-recursive remote listing breakage in 3.0.0pre1

2007-10-07 Thread Wayne Davison
> On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 01:18:46AM -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote: > > That "fix" misses the point. On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 10:27:38PM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote: > No, it's just incomplete. Actually, you were right. Turned out I just needed to limit the check to when inc_recurse was active, as t