Wondering if there are somewhere to download an rpm version for centos?
Thanx!
Wayne Davison wrote:
> I've just released rsync 3.0.0pre1, the first pre-release version for
> the upcoming 3.0.0 release. The version number is getting such a large
> bump due to the addition of an incremental recu
On 10/4/07, Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've just released rsync 3.0.0pre1, the first pre-release version for
> the upcoming 3.0.0 release.
Hooray! I have built an RPM of rsync 3.0.0pre1 and posted it here:
http://mattmccutchen.net/rsync/#rsync-packages
This pre-release has final
On 10/4/07, Frank Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This action is the simplest method of performing an rsync, but it would be
> nice to have rsync to be intelligent enough to recognize a name change but
> not an inode change on the source.
The --detect-renamed option provided by the patch
"patc
Good day,
I've got a question regarding the usage of rsync that I just cannot
figure out. I've done a fare hunt for the answer, but I'm stumped.
Here is the situation.
I have two pc's running linux and using rsync to perform a backup from
server1 to server2. For example: rsync -avzr -
On 10/3/07, Jake Conk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...] I enabled jumble frames by setting the mtu to 9000.
Jumble frames! Now there's an idea to join the ranks of the April
Fools' Day RFCs! :-D
Matt
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before po
I've just released rsync 3.0.0pre1, the first pre-release version for
the upcoming 3.0.0 release. The version number is getting such a large
bump due to the addition of an incremental recursion scan (which helps
a lot with large transfers) and the official arrival of several other
new features, in
Let me guess that you are going through a switch... does the switch
support jumbo frames? Perhaps the simple ssh traffic and "other
methods" does not generate any frames over your switch's capacity.
Go to the mfg web site and read the spec sheet.
The network layer is below rsync. rsync should b
On 10/4/07, Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, due to a bug in cygwin's pipe code (the pipe that carries data
> between rsync and ssh). Until cygwin fixes its pipe code, you can only
> reliably rsync data to/from a cygwin system if you avoid pipes (e.g. use
> a daemon transfer).
I'm
On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 10:24:23AM -0700, Miles Raymond wrote:
> From what I read from google, this seems to be a common problem with
> rsync on windows.
Yes, due to a bug in cygwin's pipe code (the pipe that carries data
between rsync and ssh). Until cygwin fixes its pipe code, you can only
reli
On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 02:08:42PM -0700, Noam Birnbaum wrote:
> Running Mac OS X 10.4.10. In my testing I have not found a way to rsync
> ACLs from source to destination. Is there a solution out there?
Try the latest CVS source -- it now supports OS X ACLs. If you want to
backup to a non-OS X
Hey all,
Running Mac OS X 10.4.10. In my testing I have not found a way to
rsync ACLs from source to destination. Is there a solution out there?
Thanks,
noam
Noam Birnbaum
http://maccentricsolutions.com/
877.luv.macs x89
Apple Certified Technical Coordinator
Apple Certified Help Desk
We've been using rsync to send updates to our webservers from a central
location for years. All the webservers used to be Windows 2000 Server running
rsync 2.6.3. Recently I've been trying to replace them with Debian servers
with rsync 2.6.9. The central file server is a Windows 2000 Server
On 10/4/07, OOzy Pal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> excludes-nix
> *
>
> include-nix
> Development/*
> www/*
> Personal/*
You are including items immediately inside each of the directories
Development, www, Personal but not the directories themselves, also,
the exclude rule * is excluding items more
Hello,
I would like only to sync few directories between my two Linux boxes.
I tries this but no help
sudo rsync -avrtzun --stats \
--include-from "include-nix" \
--exclude-from "excludes-nix" \
--delete \
--progress \
-e "ssh -l hab" /home/hab/ desktop:/home/hab
excludes-nix
*
include-nix
Deve
> On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 10:30:55AM +0100, Stuart Halliday wrote:
> > Cygwin needs to drop support for Windows 98.
> > They plan to do this 'sometime'.
>
> I wonder if defining MAXPATHLEN to a larger value would work or not?
Nope.
> That value is supposed to represent the largest string that ca
15 matches
Mail list logo