https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4977
--- Comment #4 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-16 19:16 CST ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Well i tried your command and it worked without errors...
>
> But i saw also that all files were symlinks, maybe thats the reason why it
> doesnt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Note that back-to-back rsyncs make the window of opportunity much
> > much smaller for things to change during transit.
>
> yes, but it still leaves room for corrupted transfers nobody
> would probably know about !?
>
With UNIX file semantics,
Loop until nothing i
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4977
--- Comment #3 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-16 17:26 CST ---
Well i tried your command and it worked without errors...
But i saw also that all files were symlinks, maybe thats the reason why it
doesnt works?
Gr
Erwin
--
Configure
sounds interesting - are you speaking about a special rsync version or about
this helper script:
http://marc.info/?l=rsync&m=115822570129821&w=2
?
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: "Stephen Zemlicka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Gesendet: 16.09.07 19:43:54
> An: "'roland'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Note that back-to-back rsyncs make the window of opportunity much
> much smaller for things to change during transit.
yes, but it still leaves room for corrupted transfers nobody would probably
know about !?
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Gesendet: 16.09.07 1
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4977
--- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-16 17:10 CST ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> Hello, I'm using the backup script from
> http://www.mikerubel.org/computers/rsync_snapshots/ for some time now without
> probs.
> But lately (like
> Handling of concurrent changes to source files is one of rsync's
> weaknesses.
too bad, but good to know :)
>The rsync sender naively reads each source file from
> beginning to end and sends what it sees; it doesn't detect if source
> files change while being transferred.
that`s what i fea
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4977
--- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-16 16:52 CST ---
Ah yes the command i use is:
$RSYNC \
-va --delete --delete-excluded \
--exc
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4977
Summary: rsync: failed to set times on
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.9
Platform: x86
URL: http://www.mikerubel.org/computers/rsync_snapshots/
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
If you're on windows, someone wrote a vss patch for rsync. I haven't used
it extensively though but it has worked for in-use outlook pst files so far.
I plan on testing it with exchange and sql databases in the near future.
_
Stephen Zemlicka
Integrated Computer Techno
Matt McCutchen wrote:
>
> On 9/15/07, roland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > what`s the rsync equivalent to this?
> > how can i see which files changed while rsync was
> transferring them ?
>
> Handling of concurrent changes to source files is one of rsync's
> weaknesses. The rsync sender naivel
On 9/15/07, roland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> what`s the rsync equivalent to this?
> how can i see which files changed while rsync was transferring them ?
Handling of concurrent changes to source files is one of rsync's
weaknesses. The rsync sender naively reads each source file from
beginning
On 9/16/07, Hugo Connery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, uid/access time based statistics gathering is quite orthogonal to
> rsync's motivation. But, rsync, as it backs up my data, it has access
> to all the statistics I need, so why not piggy back the stats gathering
> on rsync as a matter of e
On 9/16/07, Stephen Zemlicka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can rsync support active mirroring? I've used robocopy in the past and it
> has a –mon switch that can copy ever x changes or every x minutes. I'm
> mostly interested in the x changes as the x minutes could easily be
> scheduled.
Darryl D
Hi Matt and list,
Yes, uid/access time based statistics gathering is quite orthogonal to
rsync's motivation. But, rsync, as it backs up my data, it has access
to all the statistics I need, so why not piggy back the stats gathering
on rsync as a matter of efficiency?
But, perhaps orthogonal exten
15 matches
Mail list logo
