RE: Frequent errors copying to an SMB share

2007-08-12 Thread Greger Cronquist
Thanks for your reply, Matt! Unfortunately I already do that. The errors typically occur after a few files have been successfully updated or copied, as if the share (constructed with a "net use" command) suddenly disappears (which it doesn't). Greger > -Original Message- > From: [EMAI

RE: Option --numeric-ids not the default?

2007-08-12 Thread Tony Abernethy
Darryl Dixon wrote: > > Hi All, > > I've browsed the history of the list, but can't seem to find > an answer to something that I find quite surprising - why > isn't --numeric-ids the default when rsync is told to > preserve permissions? It seems to me that the current > behaviour runs against

Option --numeric-ids not the default?

2007-08-12 Thread Darryl Dixon - Winterhouse Consulting
Hi All, I've browsed the history of the list, but can't seem to find an answer to something that I find quite surprising - why isn't --numeric-ids the default when rsync is told to preserve permissions? It seems to me that the current behaviour runs against the grain of more than a quarter century

Re:

2007-08-12 Thread Sven . Hartrumpf
Sun, 12 Aug 2007 11:25:10 +0200, rekrutacja119 wrote: > Matt McCutchen wrote: > > On 8/4/07, Rekrutacja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> i'm trying to use latest CVS rsync, but i'm getting these errors: > >> > >> *** glibc detected *** rsync: munmap_chunk(): invalid pointer: > >> 0x0d757d58 *** > >

[Re: problems with rsync version CVS]

2007-08-12 Thread Rekrutacja
Matt McCutchen wrote: On 8/4/07, Rekrutacja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: i'm trying to use latest CVS rsync, but i'm getting these errors: *** glibc detected *** rsync: munmap_chunk(): invalid pointer: 0x0d757d58 *** This looks like the same problem Sven Hartrumpf recently encountered and descr