On Sat, Aug 04, 2007 at 07:26:19PM -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> What do you all think so far? Am I going in the right direction?
I'll hopefully have some time to check into it more later on, but I did
give your pages a look and they look pretty good. One thing I had been
trying to do was to ke
On 8/6/07, Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 01:33:22PM -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> > What is the official syntax for pulling multiple sources from a
> > daemon?
>
> It's the first example in the advanced usage section:
>
> rsync host::'modname/dir1/file1 modna
On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 01:33:22PM -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> What is the official syntax for pulling multiple sources from a
> daemon?
It's the first example in the advanced usage section:
rsync host::âmodname/dir1/file1 modname/dir2/file2â /dest
The repeating of " modname/" is requir
Matt McCutchen wrote:
Pass the -i, --itemize-changes option to see why rsync thought the
files needed copying: `s' indicates a difference in size and `t'
indicates a difference in mtime. If you get `t', make sure you are
using the -t, --times option to set mtimes of destination files equal
to t
On 8/4/07, Vitaliy Okulov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all. I want to syncronize about 20-30 Gb of small files, about 4-10
> k each. How i can speed up process of synchronization?
Try the current development version of rsync 3.0.0 from CVS (see
bottom of http://rsync.samba.org/download.html ).
On 7/30/07, Matt McCutchen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Currently, I think the best option is to do a separate rsync run for
> each notification (or group of notifications arriving close in time).
> Write a little script that reads the inotifywait output [...]
I was going to hack together a script
