On Sat, Aug 04, 2007 at 05:59:35PM -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> Why does --xattrs imply --perms (according to the man page)?
Yeah, there isn't really a good reason for that. It was probably just a
left-over from back when the patch was created (back when the original
author based the xattr patc
On 8/4/07, Rekrutacja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i'm trying to use latest CVS rsync, but i'm getting these errors:
>
> *** glibc detected *** rsync: munmap_chunk(): invalid pointer:
> 0x0d757d58 ***
This looks like the same problem Sven Hartrumpf recently encountered
and described in this thread
Dear Wayne, C Sights, and list,
I have started working on my rewritten version of the rsync man page.
So far, I have redone the top of the man page and the list of options;
I improved many of the one-line option descriptions. The yodl and man
versions of my man page are available here and here:
i'm trying to use latest CVS rsync, but i'm getting these errors:
*** glibc detected *** rsync: munmap_chunk(): invalid pointer:
0x0d757d58 ***
=== Backtrace: =
/lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6(cfree+0x1bb)[0xb7eeffeb]
rsync[0x807f2f0]
rsync[0x804bc22]
rsync[0x8056a5d]
rsync[0x8056e83]
rsyn
Why does --xattrs imply --perms (according to the man page)? Unlike
--acls, --xattrs is not logically a superset of --perms (since
system.* xattrs are ignored). I might conceivably want to copy some
user xattrs that I set on my files while allowing the destination
permissions to take the default
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4855
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #3 from [EM
Здравствуйте, rsync.
Hi all. I want to syncronize about 20-30 Gb of small files, about 4-10
k each. How i can speed up process of synchronization?
--
С уважением,
Vitaliy mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/list
