DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4787] add support for --max-delete=N where N is less than 0

2007-07-14 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4787 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4787] add support for --max-delete=N where N is less than 0

2007-07-14 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4787 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4787] add support for --max-delete=N where N is less than 0

2007-07-14 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4787 --- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-15 00:16 CST --- that works for me, thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA cont

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4787] add support for --max-delete=N where N is less than 0

2007-07-14 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4787 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4787] New: add support for --max-delete=N where N is less than 0

2007-07-14 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4787 Summary: add support for --max-delete=N where N is less than 0 Product: rsync Version: 3.0.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority:

Re: --hard-links performance

2007-07-14 Thread Wayne Davison
On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 02:47:24PM -0400, George Georgalis wrote: > I'm planning > to run *some*sort*of*dupmerge*, individually on ./1 ./2 ./3 > each time they get updated. this is to address multiple users > downloading the same source etc. ie files not necessarily in > adjacent snapshots but spac

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4757] Daemon mis-logs paths if module path in rsyncd.conf is relative

2007-07-14 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4757 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4531] symlinks updating doesn't work properly during updates

2007-07-14 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4531 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4473] Rsync tries to delete in dir it didn't create due to --dry-run

2007-07-14 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4473 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4413] Rsync skips too many files after failing to create a directory

2007-07-14 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4413 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4402] Incorrect time logged with glibc 2.5 inside chroot area

2007-07-14 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4402 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4162] Wanted: a mechanism to prevent rsync network compression of compressed files

2007-07-14 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4162 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

Re: --hard-links performance

2007-07-14 Thread George Georgalis
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 05:47:00PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 01:26:18 -0400 >From: "George Georgalis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >the program is http://www.ka9q.net/code/dupmerge/ >there are 200 lines of well commented C; however >there may be a bug whic