On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 03:33:31PM -0400, George Georgalis wrote:
>On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 11:11:27AM -0700, Chuck Wolber wrote:
>>On Tue, 5 Jun 2007, Paul Slootman wrote:
>>
>>> > In any case, what's the general consensus behind using the
>>> > --hard-links option on large (100GB and above) image
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4768
--- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-10 20:16 CST ---
It would make more sense to fix the problem by using a script that runs rsync
repeatedly with the same destination until rsync exits with a code other than
30 (timeout).
--
Hi All
Any idea when the 3.0.0 will be rolled out? Thanks!
--
Ming Zhang
@#$%^ purging memory... (*!%
http://blackmagic02881.wordpress.com/
http://www.linkedin.com/in/blackmagic02881
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mai
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 03:11:05PM +0200, Giuliano Gavazzi wrote:
> In the last sentence the term "file" is used, that for consistency
> should not include directories.
There is some inconsistency in the word "file" since it includes dirs in
its generic sense, but can be used as a short-hand for
On 10 Jul 2007, at 00:18, Matt McCutchen wrote:
On 7/9/07, Giuliano Gavazzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
you did not append "/" to your exclude patterns and you did not show
us the value of the SOURCE macro. Either might explain the failure.
All a trailing "/" would do is prevent the pattern
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4768
Summary: problem sync big filesystem over slow connection
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.8
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
