On 5/4/07, ScottZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is this a bug or is the backup option only able to backup deleted target files?
The latter: --backup only backs up files deleted from the target.
Is there another way around this?
Essentially you want to move each source file to another directory
I have a scenario where I am copying from a local system to remote target and
need to remove the local source files once they have been successfully
transfered.
--remove-source-files works fine for this.
An issue has come up in that I need to be able to backup the removed local
source files a
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 11:36:58AM +0200, Ezequiel Panepucci wrote:
> I would like to run rsync and be able to specify the target
> UID/GID to use on the command line.
It would be nice to have something like this. There are also some times
where it would be nice to give rsync some more powerful h
On 5/4/07, Charles Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That said - you said '3.0', and 'fairly soon'... does that mean that 3.0
> will be the next major release?
To clarify... will the next version be 2.7, or 3.0?
The next release will be 3.0.0. While Wayne may incorporate the
ignore-case pat
On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 03:27:18PM -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
> That said - you said '3.0', and 'fairly soon'... does that mean that
> 3.0 will be the next major release?
Yes, 3.0.0 is what is being worked on in CVS (as mentioned on the rsync
web page). You can check it out via the repository o
That said - you said '3.0', and 'fairly soon'... does that mean that 3.0
will be the next major release?
To clarify... will the next version be 2.7, or 3.0?
Thanks again!
--
Best regards,
Charles
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posti
Wayne Davison wrote:
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 01:01:20PM -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
I'm very interested in learning the status of the --ignorecase patch
being included in the main tree...
My currently plan is to include that functionality in 3.0.0. I've been
improving the patch in recent wee
On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 05:42:23PM +0200, Tobias Oetiker wrote:
> I have written a patch for rsync that adds the
> --drop-cache
> option which activates posix_fadvise64.
Thanks. I've put this in the patches dir (at least for the moment):
it is named drop-cache.diff.
..wayne..
--
To unsubscrib
On Fri, 4 May 2007, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 02:22:46PM -0500, David Harfst wrote:
> > overflow: flags=0x69 l1=110 12=1633837871 lastname=
> > ERROR: buffer overflow in receive_file_entry
> > rsync error: error allocating core memory buffers (code 22) at util.c(147)
>
> Th
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 07:26:40PM -0700, Carson Gaspar wrote:
> Emit a WARNING and set to MAX_TIME_T on the destination? It's either
> that or an ERROR and fail the transfer.
I had considered forcing the time to MAX_TIME_T, but decided against
it because I didn't want all too-large timestamps to
On 5/4/07, akahitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hi there,
i have a rsync server running in deamon mode, with a 1000 plus clients
connecting to it to retrieve files.
the problem is that when the clients connects the server has many rsync
processes running on it, each of which is around 3.8mb each.
On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 08:45:00AM -0300, Rodrigo Severo wrote:
> I'm writing to suggest a small new feature: including the number of
> deleted files on --stats.
That would be useful to have. Getting it implemented will require a
protocol change due to the fact that either the sender or the recei
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 02:22:46PM -0500, David Harfst wrote:
> overflow: flags=0x69 l1=110 12=1633837871 lastname=
> ERROR: buffer overflow in receive_file_entry
> rsync error: error allocating core memory buffers (code 22) at util.c(147)
That's indicates that something in the protocol got corr
On Sun, Apr 01, 2007 at 09:05:10PM -0500, ying lcs wrote:
> Can you please tell me what is the meaning of the following error message?
>
> rsync: chgrp
> "/media/LINUXBACKUP/backup/sample/sample/mozilla1.5/mozilla/dom/src/data/.svn/text-base/20070227225544.tar.svn-base"
> failed: Operation not pe
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 01:01:20PM -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
> I'm very interested in learning the status of the --ignorecase patch
> being included in the main tree...
My currently plan is to include that functionality in 3.0.0. I've been
improving the patch in recent weeks, and it will get
hi there,
i have a rsync server running in deamon mode, with a 1000 plus clients
connecting to it to retrieve files.
the problem is that when the clients connects the server has many rsync
processes running on it, each of which is around 3.8mb each. Basically the
server is running out of memory a
16 matches
Mail list logo
