Wayne Davison wrote:
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 05:58:38AM -0700, Carson Gaspar wrote:
Looking at the current code in CVS, it appears that rsync does not
currently support ACLs or XATTRs for Solaris ZFS filesystems
Does Solaris 10 not use posix ACLs and xattrs? I've only tested rsync
on solaris
Hello all,
I'm having a problem with an overflow error and I was hoping to get some help.
The client is Red Hat ES 3 running kernel version 2.4.21-4.ELsmp, rsync version
2.5.6
The server is Novell 6.5 SP6 running rsync version 2.6.3
I'm consistently getting the following error on the receiving
Hi:
Suppose I have the following files on my target volume:
/Applications/[45,000 sub files and directories]
/Developer/[120,000 sub files and directories]
... (another 8 or so directories with lots of files and sub directories)
/usr/ [75,000 sub files and directories]
For a total of ap
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 05:58:38AM -0700, Carson Gaspar wrote:
> Looking at the current code in CVS, it appears that rsync does not
> currently support ACLs or XATTRs for Solaris ZFS filesystems
Does Solaris 10 not use posix ACLs and xattrs? I've only tested rsync
on solaris 8 and 9 (some time a
Looking at the current code in CVS, it appears that rsync does not
currently support ACLs or XATTRs for Solaris ZFS filesystems (at least
not completely - I'm not sure how UFS/ZFS auto ACL format conversion
works). It shouldn't be too hard to add support, especially as ZFS now
uses NFSv4 ACLs.
I will be out of the office . Please contact Help Desk @ ext. 2335 in
my absence.
Thank you.
Daniel Kava
>>> rsync 04/03/07 07:00 >>>
Send rsync mailing list submissions to
rsync@lists.samba.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.samba.org/m
