On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 05:15:06PM +0200, Wesley W.Terpstra wrote:
> I would send patches, but I find it quite difficult to get patches
> against patches.
I actually don't like patches against patches. Your prior posting had a
patch against some pre-patched source, and that's the clearest way t
On Oct 28, 2006, at 12:58 AM, Wayne Davison wrote:
Yeah, the error checking is not up-to-snuff yet.
Sorry, when you said you'd checked it in, I assumed that meant you
were done with it and the final version was committed.
Now I've seen:
http://archives.free.net.ph/thread/
20061028.062640.
Hi there
I just reported a problem to the rsync list, and a minute later realised
a further test I should have tried first.
Basically it appears that "mount -t cifs" SMB shares under Linux don't
properly report low-level rename failures.
i.e. if I use rsync to overwrite a locked file rsync thin
Ok I updated both systems to rsync-2.6.8 and found the info on setting
strace on the server. Here are the trace logs, there are two calls the
first is just the module list which finishes normally the second is the
file list in the test module which fails after the list.
By the way I have no idea w
