Erick Tryzelaar wrote:
But for all the other programs, we get something different:
> cp -r a c/
> ls c
foo
> cp -r a d/
> ls d
foo
> cp -r a e/
> ls e
foo
That should be rcp in the second case, and scp in the third. Sorry about
the transcription error.
-e
--
To unsubscribe or change options
I've run into a situation where we'd like to replace rcp with rsync, but
we've run into a difference in interface, which is causing us problems.
Here's the problem. If we run this in rsync:
> mkdir tmpdir; cd tmpdir
> mkdir a; touch a/b
> rsync -r a b/
> ls b
a/
But for all the other programs,
On Oct 26, 2006, at 5:45 PM, Wayne Davison wrote:
I think this would be a useful thing to support. I don't like the
options tied in to source/dest, though as that makes it harder to
reverse a copy. I think that adding a single option, --fake-super
(since we already have --super) that does not g
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 11:55:51PM +0200, Markus Schaub wrote:
> They are Suse Linux 9
> Linux max 2.6.11.4-21.7-smp #1 SMP Thu Jun 2 14:23:14 UTC 2005 i686 i686 i386
> GNU/Linux
> rsync version 2.6.3 protocol version 28
I'd suggest upgrading to 2.6.9pre3 and see if the problem persists,
since
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 03:19:33PM -0400, Aldrich, Michael wrote:
> Can some tell me if there is a way to change the uid of files
> transferred?
The only way at present is to login as that user on the destination
system:
rsync -av /src/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/dest/
sudo -u applpatch rsync -av [EMAIL
(resent as I got the impression this was not sent out to the members of the
list last week, the issue still exists)
Hello all
I have two Linux boxes. The first one is samba servers for the Windows clients.
The second one is backup storage. So every few hours rsnc synchronises the data
director
Can some tell me if there is a way to change the uid of files transferred.
Example on source the system "appltest (uid 100)" owns all the files I want to
transfer but on the other system I want "applpatch (uid101)" to own them?
Thanks
--
Michael Aldrich
Unix Systems/Pro
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 02:20:50PM -0400, John P. Speno wrote:
> Does rsync skip the currently uploading files of other rsyncs by
> default? Or should I do it via an exclude pattern?
You can either add an exclude, which will be easy to do if you don't
have any other dot files (e.g. --exclude='.*
I've just released rsync 2.6.9pre3. This should be the last version
before the final 2.6.9 release, and I don't foresee any significant
changes between it and the final release.
Please test this out and email the rsync mailing list with any
questions, comments, bug reports, etc. Thanks!
Here ar
On Oct 25, 2006, at 9:44 PM, Olivier Thauvin wrote:
Le Friday 20 October 2006 16:26, John P. Speno a écrit :
Is there a way to instruct rsync to ignore a file that is currently
growing in size?
However I can understand mirroring opened files is an issue, but I
failed to
see this happening
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 05:05:53PM +0100, David Cuthill wrote:
> log format = %a %n %b
> log file = C:/rsync/rsyncd.log
Don't forget to set:
transfer logging = yes
..wayne..
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: htt
Hi,
We've got a current rsync deployment that's just gone live and will
eventually have over 200 clients. The server is running on Windows
Server 2003 (no choice :( ) with the cygwin libs and the clients are all
Linux - all is well so far. Two questions regarding log files:
1) We need more d
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 01:25:56PM +0200, Wesley W. Terpstra wrote:
> I was thinking of options like '--source-fake-root' and '--dest-fake-
> root'. The client turns '--dest-fake-root' into '--source-fake-root'
> on the remote rsync process.
I think this would be a useful thing to support. I d
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 12:14:11PM +0200, Janning Vygen wrote:
> I run rsync as root to get the permission to overwrite those files:
>
> # rsync bar/ foo/
You'd need to use --inplace to avoid changing the current owner. This
has the downside that the file is briefly in-transition between th
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 02:12:47AM -0700, atstake atstake wrote:
> [remote]
> path = /backup/remote/
> comment = remote
> read only = no
> use chroot = no
> timeout = 3600
> transfer logging = yes
> log file = remote.log
The "log file" directive is not a per-module setting in anything prior
to 2.6
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 01:03:38PM +0200, Wesley W. Terpstra wrote:
> I've built CVS, but had to make this change: flist.c:983:
Thanks -- I had neglected to build xattr support w/o acls.
> Also, these warnings remain:
I'll check into those.
> The problem I anticipate is that MacOSX has a lot mo
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 05:58:45AM -0400, Victor Shoup wrote:
> I'm wondering, though: does the xattr code avoid copying, or even
> comparing hashes of, the xattr data itself? Especially on OSX there
> can be a lot of this stuff, and it would be nice if changes in the
> xattr's were detected qui
Ok, I've done some reading on this topic. osx ACLs are much more like
windows than posix. You can read about them here:
http://www.bresink.com/osx/193281/Docs-en/ACL.html
It seems that suse and unitedlinux have defined a mapping between
windows and posix acls for samba:
http:/
Right now, if you want a faithful backup of a system, you must either
have root access on the target machine (for chown, mknod, ...), or
you have to arrange for fakeroot/pretendroot to wrap itself around
the rsync server to catch all these permissions/etc and keep them in
a database file. A
On Oct 26, 2006, at 4:01 AM, Wayne Davison wrote:
Great! I've taken your code, tweaked it a little, and then did some
bug-fixing of the xattr code in general (I found some buffer problems
quickly using valgrind). The end result is now in CVS and in the most
recent "nightly" tar file (see the do
Hi,
i am using rsync since years and i think it's one of the must-use tools.
Great!
Today i got my first problem after years of usage and the fantastic manpage
doesn't give me any answer, neither the web does.
I am starting with two directory "foo" and "bar" with a text file "test.txt"
in eac
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4168
--- Comment #3 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-26 05:30 MST ---
The master server isn't a NFS Server nor a NFS mounted volume.
All files are stored on a XFS partition with "noatime" flag.
The rsync use ssh as transport maybe this could a
I'm glad to see rsync may finally be getting proper support for
extended attributes
on OSX (since apple's own implementation of this is notoriously buggy).
I'm wondering, though: does the xattr code avoid copying, or even
comparing
hashes of, the xattr data itself? Especially on OSX there ca
Two things:
1) New implementation
I started to develop an implementation (not a wrapper) of the rsync
"protocol". Its purpose is to create a version that can run on windows
without cygwin and to create an API for building a GUI. The method to
get there is to create a platform independent version
I got rsyncd v2.6.6 protocol version 29 running on Suse Enterprise
Server 10. Here's what my /etc/rsyncd.conf looks like -
max connections = 0
log format = %a %h %o %f %l %b
log file = /var/log/rsync/rsync.log
[nibbler]
path = /backup/nibbler
comment = nibbler
read only = no
use chroot = no
time
25 matches
Mail list logo
