Re: Rsync order of maginitude slower with twice as large directory

2006-09-20 Thread Gerben Wierda
On Sep 20, 2006, at 23:51, Wojtek.Pilorz wrote: Check swap usage during rsync as well as rsync memory usage; perhaps rsync dataset no longer fits into core, so swap slows it all down. I have checked this, but that is not the problem. What I did notice is something else. Part of a smaller tre

Re: Rsync order of maginitude slower with twice as large directory

2006-09-20 Thread Wojtek.Pilorz
Check swap usage during rsync as well as rsync memory usage; perhaps rsync dataset no longer fits into core, so swap slows it all down. Wojtek On Wed, 20 Sep 2006, Gerben Wierda wrote: > Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 23:16:39 +0200 > From: Gerben Wierda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: rsync@lists.samba.org

Rsync order of maginitude slower with twice as large directory

2006-09-20 Thread Gerben Wierda
I am in the habit of syncing my /usr/local tree over several computers (all Mac OS X). Recently my /usr/local tree has doubled in size, from 300,000 files to 600,000 files because I have added a large subversion checkout (TeX Live). As a result, rsync has become a time hog. Instead of a minute

rsync and posix_fadvise

2006-09-20 Thread Tobias Oetiker
Hi, I use rsync for hardlink-backup ... since I run this quite frequently, linux happily fills its cache with stuff that should not realy go there I have set /proc/sys/vm/swappiness to 0 which helps, but since this acts across board it is not ideal. Better would be to use posix_fadvise to PO

Re: Clarification on the RSYNC_RAW_STATUS and RSYNC_EXIT_STATUS

2006-09-20 Thread Rob Bosch
Wayne, thanks for the clarification. We're going to use a SQL query across the SSH tunnel to the database where we are centralizing the errors. Given this structure we can see if the server reported the error such as an interrupt or some dropped connection. If it didn't we'll post the client res

Re: Clarification on the RSYNC_EXIT_STATUS

2006-09-20 Thread Rob Bosch
Wayne answered in my separate post...ignore this message. Rob "Rob Bosch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > I'm guessing no one else has seen this issue? Most exit codes are properly > reported (e.g. code 12, code 10, code 2). The specific scenario is when a > f

Re: Solaris ACL support

2006-09-20 Thread Andrew Gideon
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 08:53:21 -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote: > If you want ACLs, apply the patch and pass > --enable-acl-support when you configure. That gives you observance of > default ACLs when -p is disabled and an option -A, --acls to preserve > ACLs. The man page is patched to document -A an