Some Files are Missing

Hello All, I'm kishore, new to this group. I'm using rsync to backup the Directory from local system to remote system. I'm using the command: rsync -rlt PATH(path of the filename to be backed up) IPAddress:/Path (where the file has to be backedup). I'm able to backup the direc

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4016] literal IPv6 addresses not supported in ssh protocol

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4016 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4016] literal IPv6 addresses not supported in ssh protocol

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4016 --- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-17 20:17 MST --- Created an attachment (id=2144) --> (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=2144&action=view) Fix to avoid skipping the leading '[' This patch gets rid of the code th

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3958] ile over 13 carateres, they are syncro all time!!!

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3958 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from [EM

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3978] readonly source -> incomplete transfers (permission problems)

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3978 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

Re: Questions and comments regarding --remove-sent-files (Was: New delete option?)

On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 02:05:10PM -0500, Evan Harris wrote: > So, I agree with the parent message that either --remove-sent-files should > delete the files immediately after they are successfully sent, or a new > option should be added (--move maybe?) that does it that way. It can never do it i

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4001] man page should document --server flag and SSH forced command scenario

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3979] writefd_unbuffered failed to write 4092 bytes phase send_file_entry broken pipe

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3979 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC|[EMAIL PROTECTED] | --- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PR

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3979] writefd_unbuffered failed to write 4092 bytes phase send_file_entry broken pipe

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3979 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from [EM

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4017] rsync 2.6.8: "unexpected tag 3 [sender]"

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4017 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4079] rsync fails with --inplace, --link-dest and --no-whole-file

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4079 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4079] rsync fails with --inplace, --link-dest and --no-whole-file

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4079 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #2142 is|0 |1 obsolete|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4079] rsync fails with --inplace, --link-dest and --no-whole-file

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4079 --- Comment #5 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-17 18:18 MST --- Created an attachment (id=2142) --> (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=2142&action=view) Fix --inplace when basis file doesn't match dest file Here's a patch tha

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3846] rsync silently transfers blocks of zero bytes on read errors

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3846 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

Re: rsync re-link instead of delete/copy?

On 9/17/06, Allasso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Whenever a folder has been renamed or moved on the source, rsync will delete all the recursive files on the destination filesystem, and then recopy them to the newly named/moved folder. This can take a long time. Is there a way to get rsync to simpl

rsync re-link instead of delete/copy?

Hello, I am using rsync to do daily backups on another filesystem. Whenever a folder has been renamed or moved on the source, rsync will delete all the recursive files on the destination filesystem, and then recopy them to the newly named/moved folder. This can take a long time. Is there a way

Re: RSYNC_ARG# question

On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 09:38:03PM -0600, Rob Bosch wrote: > the ARG values include all the options but the /usr/bin value. I'd like to > be able to track the remote directory being used. Is this possible? Nope. The remote rsync doesn't get told about local information that it doesn't require (