im trying to insall sims 2 night life when it gets 39% through something
pops up saying (a problem occurred when trying to transfer the file
Tsbata/res/sound/sfxk1.package rfrom the media) can u help me with my problem n
tell me how to get it to work thanks.jess
--
To unsubscribe or change o
Dear Rsync,
I am seeing the following rsync error messages and I am wondering if it is
a sign of trouble, expected behavior, or a bug:
rsync: failed to hard-link /Volumes/backups/vanguard/backup.0/dev/agpgart
with dev/agpgart: Invalid argument (22)
rsync: failed to hard-link /Volumes/backups/v
I tried with a window, it does the same thing :/
-Original Message-
From: Tony Abernethy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 07, 2006 12:15 PM
To: Wayne Swart; rsync@lists.samba.org
Subject: RE: Rsync over samba mounts (bad file descriptor)
rsync -avuz
The -a wants most all of t
rsync -avuz
The -a wants most all of the UNIX permission
(which do NOT exist on a samba mount)
Easiest way is to try copying from the samba mount to a local filesystem
and see which attributes you can actually copy.
(man cp to see how to spell things)
(You have my congrats if you get more
Hi Tony
Thanks for the speedy reply.
Yes, the windows server is mounted on the BSD machine like you explained.
I don't really mind to preserve date / time stamps on the files, or permissions.
Surely there must be a way to get this to work.
Copying the whole folder (folder at a time) to the BSD
Some things fast off the top of my head
(flames invited where I'm wrong;)
I am assuming:
Files live on the Window server.
smb mounted onto the BSD server
(It does what it can, but it's a few cards shy of a full deck)
There is a buch of whatever in Windows ACLs, but
there is enough UNIX permission
Hello everyone
I am trying to do incremental backups using rsync and SSH.
I have a windows server with two shares on it that I want to sync remotely to
another machine.
[]
| windows server |
[]
[]
| FreeBSD server |
[]
[
Wayne Davison wrote:
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 01:59:54PM -0400, Bob Bagwill wrote:
You probably already considered this, but you could also do something
like this: [...]
That divides the entire file-list up into 50-file chunks, whereas I
believe that the original poster wanted to allow 50 dif
