A
"simple" test to try (this assumes LOTS of free disk
space)
1)
Rsync from source to a fresh empty target.
2) Use
Windows (explorer) to copy (or move) from that (now not-empty) target to the
original target.
3) If
your luck is like mine, the copy will bomb out on one of the DOS 8.3
file
The
place for confusion is on the target. Nothing is renamed on the
source.
If the
target has more than one file matching RICHED*.cab, however it got there, expect
trouble.
For
whatever reason,
the temp file
.RICHED~1.cab.X was renamed to RICHED~1.cab (on the target),
is
exactly
Hi Tony,
I understood. I thought you were
referring to possible confusion between two files on the source - like
RICHED~2.cab and RICHED~1.cab getting copied to the target and the 'wrong' file
being renamed. In this case, there's only one file on the source getting
copied to the target.
TARGET
The
rename is on the target side, not the source.
If the
file is OPEN on the target side, Windows will not let you rename or otherwise
mess with it.
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of
Corey Wirun - personalSent: Sunday, J
Thanks Tony,
The source only has one file: RICHED~1.cab,
so my guess is that the short name business isn't what is biting me
here.
Corey.
- Original Message -
From:
Tony
Abernethy
To: Corey Wirun - Lists ; rsync@lists.samba.org
Sent: Sunday, 25 June, 2006 07:31
This
is mostly wild guesses (with luck you get some more knowledgeable
answers)
From
what I have observed ...
file
of the form .RICHED~1.cab.IEKJmo is an rsync temporary of file
RICHED~1.CAB
Trying
to rename the temporary file to its permanent name, it ran into trouble on the
name RICHED
Dominik Vogt wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 24, 2006 at 10:17:01AM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
> Of course there is netstat, but my question was aiming for the
> command on AIX that can be used in place of Linux' strace.
Try 'truss' ('man 5 truss'). It's very likely to be present
on every modern Unix syste
On Sat, Jun 24, 2006 at 10:17:01AM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 03:26:40PM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > There is another machine in between that forwards all tcp
> > packets to the target machine:
>
> I haven't used socat before, but have successfully used nc (netcat), s
