Re: Rsync - does it really do an *exact* copy?

2006-05-31 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 08:58 -0800, tyko brown wrote: > > I don't think I would have had this problem if the man page was correct. > > With the FC5 distro, the man page for rsync doesn't match the version > > (which is 2.6.6). That is, if I 'man rsync' there is no information at > > all in regards

Re: Rsync - does it really do an *exact* copy?

2006-05-31 Thread Wayne Davison
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 11:18:03PM +1000, martin aa wrote: > which, IMHO, I think should actually say: > -a, --archive archive mode; equivalent to -rlptgoD (no -H, -X, > -A) This is a good idea. I updated the acls.diff and xattrs.diff patches in CVS so that they update this summary

Re: Rsync - does it really do an *exact* copy?

2006-05-31 Thread tyko brown
> I don't think I would have had this problem if the man page was correct. > With the FC5 distro, the man page for rsync doesn't match the version > (which is 2.6.6). That is, if I 'man rsync' there is no information at > all in regards to the -X (--xattrs) option. Did you report this as a bug so

Re: Rsync - does it really do an *exact* copy?

2006-05-31 Thread martin aa
> - Original Message - > From: "Matt McCutchen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "martin aa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Rsync - does it really do an *exact* copy? > Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 15:50:35 -0400 > > > On Mon, 2006-05-29 at 17:55 +0200, Paul Slootman wrote: > > On Mon 29 May 2006,