Re: rsync shows poor throughput vs. scp

On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 03:29:12PM -0400, Marty Mulligan wrote: > Why is scp /so much faster/ than rsync here? Is there anything I can do > to improve the speed of these transfers? > > Fwiw, this is the rsync command I'm issuing: > > rsync -azL --whole-file --stats --progress --delete sender::m

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3787] Optional exit code indicating receiver was changed

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3787 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3718] RSync should verify permission/time before commiting a change

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3718 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #5 from [EM

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3649] buffer overflow in receive_file_entry

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3649 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from [EM

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3646] rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (3207118 bytes received so far) [generator]

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3646 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3778] rsync triggers ( pre/post xter scripts )

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3778 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from [EM

RE: rsync gui?

After a 10 seconds Google search, i found this : http://www.opbyte.it/grsync/ Maybe you could find more after a deep search ;) Catch you later -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Pär Moberg Envoyé : lundi 29 mai 2006 14:33 À : [EMAIL PROTE