RE: --include-from doesn't include

2006-05-10 Thread Davies, Roger
Actually, I had it, I just can't cut and paste to email properly. However, I did just try removing the backslash '\' from everywhere, and that was the trick. I had issues getting the '~/My Documents' recognized from the command line, so I went with all the backslashes. SO, broken: +\ /Applicatio

Re: --include-from doesn't include

2006-05-10 Thread Wayne Davison
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 03:48:56PM -0600, Davies, Roger wrote: > [RD] I actually tried this, and it seems the include lines are just > being ignored. You missed the very first include I cited, which happens to be the most important one. ..wayne.. -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://list

RE: --include-from doesn't include

2006-05-10 Thread Davies, Roger
Wayne, thanks for the quick reply. >You have neglected to add rules to let rsync get down into any of those >parent dirs mentioned in this rule, so this rule will never encounter >anything to match. If you had specified this: > >+ Application Data/ >+ Application Data/IDMComp/ >+ Application Da

RE: rsync ok with open files?

2006-05-10 Thread Davies, Roger
I always get a file consistency error backing up the outlook.pst file. For my own machine, I run a step to quit the outlook.exe process then the backup then restart outlook. The utility I'm using came from beyondlogic.org. I don't know if there is a way to get that same functionality if you

RE: rsync ok with open files?

2006-05-10 Thread Peter
--- Tony Abernethy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Fundamental difference between unix and windows. > Windows locks against simultaneous whatever. > Unix assumes you know what you're doing. > Unix allows deleting a file while someone is writing to it. > > Also, you will likely need to stop BOTH out

RE: rsync ok with open files?

2006-05-10 Thread Tony Abernethy
Fundamental difference between unix and windows. Windows locks against simultaneous whatever. Unix assumes you know what you're doing. Unix allows deleting a file while someone is writing to it. Also, you will likely need to stop BOTH outlooks. There's usually one running that you do not see. > -

RE: rsync ok with open files?

2006-05-10 Thread Tevfik Karagülle
AFAIK, rsync cannot copy open files. Outlook must be stopped in your case. Rgrds Tev > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Peter > Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 6:06 PM > To: rsync > Subject: rsync ok with open files? > > Hi gang.

Re: --include-from doesn't include

2006-05-10 Thread Wayne Davison
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 12:30:32PM -0600, Davies, Roger wrote: > + Application\ Data/IDMComp/** (FYI, there's no need to backslash a space, but I suppose it doesn't hurt.) You have neglected to add rules to let rsync get down into any of those parent dirs mentioned in this rule, so this rule will

--include-from doesn't include

2006-05-10 Thread Davies, Roger
I'm trying to backup certain pieces of my XP workstations home directory to a mapped drive using rsync on Cygwin. I was able to create a fairly useful exclude-from list, but I'm unable to re-include portions a subset of an excluded directory. My rsync command looks like this: rsync -avn --delet

Re: is not working running through Cron

2006-05-10 Thread Manuel Kissoyan
both servers have the same version... rsync version 2.6.8 protocol version 29 Copyright (C) 1996-2006 by Andrew Tridgell, Wayne Davison, and others. - Original Message - From: "Wayne Davison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Manuel Kissoyan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "rsync list" Sent: We

Re: is not working running through Cron

2006-05-10 Thread Wayne Davison
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 01:35:08PM -0300, Manuel Kissoyan wrote: > rsync: --delete-during: unknown option > rsync error: syntax or usage error (code 1) at main.c(1084) > > is a bug? No, it just means you need to upgrade that version of rsync. (Since the version on the remote (sending) side was 2

Re: is not working running through Cron

2006-05-10 Thread Manuel Kissoyan
Well Wayne is not accepting that option.. rsync: --delete-during: unknown option rsync error: syntax or usage error (code 1) at main.c(1084) is a bug? thanx! - Original Message - From: "Wayne Davison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Manuel Kissoyan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "rsyn

rsync ok with open files?

2006-05-10 Thread Peter
Hi gang. I am synchronizing Windows machines (cwRsync/cygwin) with FreeBSD server. A batch file is used to initiate the process (shell invoked rsync daemon). My question is whether I need to tell my users to close any affected applications (ex: Outlook; I am synchronizing the outlook.pst file) d

Re: is not working running through Cron

2006-05-10 Thread Manuel Kissoyan
Thanx Wayne, ill give it a try and let you know. - Original Message - From: "Wayne Davison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Manuel Kissoyan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "rsync list" Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 12:19 PM Subject: Re: is not working running through Cron On Tue, May 09, 2006

Re: connection reset by peer error (in server log)

2006-05-10 Thread Doug Lochart
Ok we got the client log a minute ago and it also had a similar reset message, here is a snippetrsync: writefd_unbuffered failed to write 4 bytes: phase "unknown"[sender]: Connection reset by peer (104) rsync: read error: Connection reset by peer (104)rsync error: error in rsync protocol data strea

Re: is not working running through Cron

2006-05-10 Thread Wayne Davison
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 12:54:58PM -0300, Manuel Kissoyan wrote: > rsync error: timeout in data send/receive (code 30) at io.c(171) > [sender=2.6.8] > rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (24336606 bytes received so far) > [receiver] I note that the command is up and running, but that it timed

Re: connection reset by peer error (in server log)

2006-05-10 Thread Wayne Davison
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 02:35:47PM +, Doug Lochart wrote: > Can anyone shed some light on this error we are getting or know of a > way to find out more info? As explained on the issues and debugging page of the rsync website, a closed connection tells us nothing about what has happened to caus

Re: --whole-file checksum

2006-05-10 Thread Wayne Davison
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 09:42:32AM -0500, Eric Kamm wrote: > During a "--whole-file" induced file transfer, is a whole > file checksum performed? Yes, rsync always sends a whole-file checksum for every file that it transfers (so that the receiver can verify that the file it creates matches its che

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3768] --no-specials in Rsync 2.6.8 breaks compatibility with 2.6.0-r6 Mirroring system

2006-05-10 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3768 --- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-10 09:58 MST --- The only time that rsync sends the --no-specials option is when the user has requested only the transfer of devices and not special files. This undoubtedly means that the op

--whole-file checksum

2006-05-10 Thread Eric Kamm
I'm trying to understand an aspect of "--whole-file" behavior. During a "--whole-file" induced file transfer, is a whole file checksum performed? The man page states that *rsync* verifies each transferred file: Note that rsync always verifies that each transferred file was correctly reco

connection reset by peer error (in server log)

2006-05-10 Thread Doug Lochart
Can anyone shed some light on this error we are getting or know of a way to find out more info?  Thanks in advance for any help ... we are puzzled.Our server is Linux, rsync version 2.6.7 running in daemon mode Our clients are windows; using cwrsync version 2.6.7Our method of transport is opening a

RE: Upgrade from 2.3.1 to 2.6.6 fail

2006-05-10 Thread Foo Donald
Hi Wayne, Thanks for your advice, it is working now after I put int the IPV6 format. Regards, Donald -Original Message- From: Wayne Davison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 2:03 PM To: Foo Donald Cc: rsync@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Upgrade from 2.3.1 to 2.6.6 f

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3768] New: --no-specials in Rsync 2.6.8 breaks compatibility with 2.6.0-r6 Mirroring system

2006-05-10 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3768 Summary: --no-specials in Rsync 2.6.8 breaks compatibility with 2.6.0-r6 Mirroring system Product: rsync Version: 2.6.8 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW

Re: Filename too long

2006-05-10 Thread E . Sriram
Has this issue been fixed in the latest version. On 4/27/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Me, I'd move to a current version. Source, ./configure ; make; make install seems to work fine for me on RedHat 6.2, 7.1 assorted Fedora Core. Workaround is probably to tar the file and rsyn