> Object: Re: Question about rsync and BIG mirror
Thanks for all your answers and advices. My problem seems on the side of
the 2MB line one time the whole 190GB data are synchronised. I will keep
in touch and give some feedbacks.
Thanks for all
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.
hi there
i'm trying to backup a 3gig directory with about 100.000 files from a
windows pc to a linux box with rsync but the process stalls (hangs).
setting a "--timeout 60" shows me that the i/o stalls.
doing the same with smaller directories works perfectly but the whole
100.000 files seem
I've tried to use all IP for hosts allow and that does not work either.
It is so strange. The Malformed address error only happens with private
ip and not the INET ip.
===
Update
===
After further investigation, I've found eth1(private ip) uses the same
gateway as eth0(INET ip). The gateway ip i
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 04:25:53PM -0700, David Bear wrote:
> I get a message from ssh, "bad escape character 'ssh -l username'".
Using one extra -v will show you the ssh command that rsync is running,
and that will allow you to test it outside of rsync. Then (assuming you
get the same error), yo
I have setup rsync to run as a deamon exporting one module named home.
when I attempt to use the rsync syntax specified on
http://samba.anu.edu.au/ftp/rsync/rsync.html
as follows:
rsync -av -e "ssh -l ssh-user" [EMAIL PROTECTED]::module /dest
I get a message from ssh, "bad escape character 'ssh
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 02:47:48PM -0800, Jonathan Chen -X (jonachen - The
Armada Group, Inc. at Cisco) wrote:
> 2006/03/06 14:28:28 [28327] malformed address localhost.localdomain
> 2006/03/06 14:28:28 [28327] malformed address dev-01.foo.com
> 2006/03/06 14:28:28 [28327] rsync denied on module t
On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 10:01:08AM +0800, Jon Miller wrote:
> rsync -rRutzvP --volume=apps: ./ 192.168.1.252::SCA/apps
FYI: The official rsync doesn't have a --volume option, so I don't know
if the Novell modifications might be causing this or not.
> rsync error: error in socketIO (code 10) at i
Hello all,
I've run out of of ideas as to why its not working. Below is my
configuration for hosts allow. Even when I have 'hosts allow' off, it
still doesn't work.
Rsync host
==
rsync version 2.5.7 protocol version 26
/etc/rsyncd.conf
hosts allow = 10.17.44.84 10.17.44.85 localhos
Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> >While you're there, one little trick I've found that speeds up
> >scanning large directory hierarchies is to stat() or open() entries in
> >inode-number order. For some filesystems it makes no difference, but
> >for others it reduces the average disk seek time as on many
Jamie Lokier wrote:
>While you're there, one little trick I've found that speeds up
>scanning large directory hierarchies is to stat() or open() entries in
>inode-number order. For some filesystems it makes no difference, but
>for others it reduces the average disk seek time as on many common
>fi
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3584
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 07:18:45PM +0200, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> > In fact, I know of at least one place where they don't use rsync because
> > they don't have enough RAM+SWAP to hold the list of files in memory.
> >
> > As far as future directions for rsync, I think this
Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> >Hmm. My home directory, on my laptop (a mere 60GB disk), does contain
> >millions of files, and it takes about 20 minutes to build the list on
> >a good day. 100Mbps network, but it's I/O bound not network bound.
> >
> >It looks a lot like the number of files is more sig
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 07:18:45PM +0200, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> In fact, I know of at least one place where they don't use rsync because
> they don't have enough RAM+SWAP to hold the list of files in memory.
>
> As far as future directions for rsync, I think this is the major place
> where rsyn
Jamie Lokier wrote:
>Hmm. My home directory, on my laptop (a mere 60GB disk), does contain
>millions of files, and it takes about 20 minutes to build the list on
>a good day. 100Mbps network, but it's I/O bound not network bound.
>
>It looks a lot like the number of files is more significant tha
jp wrote:
> 100gb of 4-40MB files sounds like my home PC full of digital photos I've
> taken. It backs up to a linux PC right beside it with rsync. I don't
> really call it that big a project for rsync. Big things for rsync are
> millions of files. At 100mbps, it takes a few seconds to build the
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 10:49:55AM +0800, Huang, YongHui wrote:
> I have a question about how to distinguish local add and remote delete?
I just added this info to rsync's "resources" webpage:
If you need a 2-way synchronization because both ends of the connection
may be changing files, you m
At 9:30 AM + 3/6/06, gARetH baBB wrote:
On Sun, 5 Mar 2006, Lawrence D. Dunn wrote:
Chris rapier has been working on a fix for this, see:
>http://www.psc.edu/networking/projects/hpn-ssh/
Note this affects anything using ssl, like scp, sftp, rsync -e ssh, etc.
None of those th
100gb of 4-40MB files sounds like my home PC full of digital photos I've
taken. It backs up to a linux PC right beside it with rsync. I don't
really call it that big a project for rsync. Big things for rsync are
millions of files. At 100mbps, it takes a few seconds to build the list.
I use the
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3584
--- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-03-06 05:21 MST ---
Created an attachment (id=1775)
--> (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=1775&action=view)
Patch for base64 in authenticate.c
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzi
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3584
Summary: base64 function does not pad output correctly
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.6
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
C
On Sun, 5 Mar 2006, Lawrence D. Dunn wrote:
> Chris rapier has been working on a fix for this, see:
>http://www.psc.edu/networking/projects/hpn-ssh/
> Note this affects anything using ssl, like scp, sftp, rsync -e ssh, etc.
None of those things use *SSL/TLS* ...
There may indeed be a pro
> -Message d'origine-
> De : BOYE Johan
> Envoyé : lundi 6 mars 2006 08:28
> À : 'Jan-Benedict Glaw'
> Objet : RE: Question about rsync and BIG mirror
>
>
> > I'm preparing a plan for a production mode in my company: we need to
> > mirror around 100GB of data trough a special VPN inte
23 matches
Mail list logo