I am using rsync in
a situation where the amount of bwlimit I want to use changes depending on the
time of day.
for example, I
start rsync at 2am when no-one else is using the system, so I want it to
use 100k/sec. At 9am, it is still running, but as the bandwidth of the link
it's using no
// I wonder if this message has been posted, so I sent it again //
Hello,
I'm quite a n00b on rsync stuff but I went to the website, read
FAQ/how-to, Google and more, I setup my own rsync server and clients:
everything works fine :-D
I'm preparing a plan for a production mode in my company:
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 05:10:07PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> What do I need to do to correct this problem?
Since the problem is in your system's header files, you'll need to do
some investigation. At the very least, you should look to see what the
code is on the lines where the first erro
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 02:07:14PM -0500, Linus Hicks wrote:
> I do not understand the exceeding long times shown in the last two
> runs.
Since the user/sys CPU time didn't also mushroom, I would suggest that
you check to see if your system ran out of free memory and started to
thrash as memory wa
Linus, I was looking at your 1.6 GB rsync transfers, the "initial copy"
without that file on the destination is faster than that of using
"--inplace" and not using inplace option. I also came across the same
results but still I am trying with some other datafiles to again confirm.
All the tests
Hi,
I downloaded rsync-2.6.7pre2 and ran
the configure without problem. But 'make' showed a bunch of errors
(see below). What do I need to do to correct this problem? Thanks.
:
:
:
config.status: creating shconfig
config.status: creating config.h
rsync 2.6.7pre2 configuration
successful
On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 15:25 -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:
> http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/rsync-2.6.7pre3.tar.gz
rsync-acl passes all the tests on my computer. I successfully built an
rsync-acl prepatched source package and an rsync-acl RPM. I posted both
on my Web site for anyone who woul
I've just released rsync 2.6.7pre3 -- the third, and (hopefully) final
pre-release version of the 2.6.7 release. Please test this out and
email the rsync mailing list with any questions, comments, bug reports,
etc. Thanks!
You can download the tar file and its signature from here:
http://rs
Here's my contribution to information on performance. There are two different
cases. The first is a 1.6gb file that has a low volume of updates. The second
case is a 4gb file that has a high volume. All are non-local transfers. I do not
understand the exceeding long times shown in the last two r
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3570
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
Thank you for your insight. It has been very beneficial!On 3/2/06, Tevfik Karagülle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all, we are just beginning to dive into rsync. I have> limited experience with just playing around with the examples
> and reading all the docs that I can. I just read an> interest
Hello,
I'm quite a n00b on rsync stuff but I went to the website, read
FAQ/how-to, Google and more, I setup my own rsync server and clients:
everything works fine :-D
I'm preparing a plan for a production mode in my company: we need to
mirror around 100GB of data trough a special VPN internet
> Hi all, we are just beginning to dive into rsync. I have
> limited experience with just playing around with the examples
> and reading all the docs that I can. I just read an
> interesting post from a developer that mentions cwrsync is a
> minimalistic rsync and thus things like permission
13 matches
Mail list logo
