DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3492] rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (24 bytes read so far)

2006-02-10 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3492 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from [EM

Re: chmod/chown on receiver

2006-02-10 Thread Wayne Davison
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 10:44:58PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > These files have to be rw by wwwrun on the receiver. As long as your remote-shell logs in as user wwwrun, the files will be owned by that user. If you're logging in as root, just run rsync as that user (e.g. --rsync-path="su -

Re: remove-sent-files

2006-02-10 Thread Wayne Davison
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 10:41:06PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > wouldn't it be much more comfortable if rsync would delete every sent > file just after completing the single file transfer? Having the --remove-sent-files option make the sender remove files as soon as it has sent the file would

chmod/chown on receiver

2006-02-10 Thread rsync
Hi there, I'm pushing a directory tree from a samba server with notificytion via fileschanged (FAM) to a webserver for procession images into an image-database. These files have to be rw by wwwrun on the receiver. If the receiver woul pull the files, the script could chmod after transfer, bu

remove-sent-files

2006-02-10 Thread rsync
Hi all, wouldn't it be much more comfortable if rsync would delete every sent file just after completing the single file transfer? Thus one could transfer files that could be processed by the receiver and there get moved or deleted avter processing. With large directories and e.g. wireless conn

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3488] writefd_unbuffered failed to write 4096 bytes: phase "unknown" [generator]: Broken pipe (32)

2006-02-10 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3488 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|