When I try to patch rsync to allow for acls I get the
following:
patch -p0 < patches/acls.diff
Looks like a unified context diff.
Hunk #1 failed at line 25.
Hunk #2 failed at line 0.
2 out of 2 hunks failed: saving rejects to
Makefile.in.rej
The next patch looks like a unified context diff.
Th
Title: [Bug 1675] New: rsync cannot cope with literal IPv6 addresses
Dear Sir or Madam,
Currently, we are using Rsync 2.6.6. I wonder if this version is compatible with IPv6? I would really appreciate your feedback.
Sincerely,
Nurten Helvaci
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http
At 5:43 PM -0800 1/20/06, Wayne Davison wrote:
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 07:36:22PM -0600, Walls, Bryan (MSFC-IS04) ef wrote:
Is there a way to force rsync to take permissions from the enclosing
folder? Or something?
One solution is to grab a nightly snapshot tar file of rsync because
I've add
Hi everybody,
I have this situation:
1 pc SLES9 with Rsync Client 2.6.2 set to use the UTF-8 codepage
1 pc Windows 2000 with CWRsync Server 1.2.1 set to use ISO8859-8 codepage
When I try to syncronize files from the SLES9 with character like à,ù,ò. to the Windows 2000, they aren't transl
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 01:06:03PM +0100, Christophe LYON wrote:
> However, I don't understand well you last comment (rsync only deletes
> in directories that it sends).
Let's look at the man-page:
--delete
This tells rsync to delete extraneous files from the receiving side
(ones that are
Wayne Davison wrote:
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 07:30:00PM +0100, Christophe LYON wrote:
My original command was:
rsync -aR --exclude=dirb --exclude-deleted dira dirb /tmp
I assumed the -R was unneeded because dira and dirb have no path
information. If that info was elided, then things may becom
