Hi:
I have an application where there is a single file-server and
approximately 500 clients that are writing a continuous stream of
moderate-sized data files. We have been using samba for this, but the
problem is each smbd process on the server side ends up chewing up
50-60 megs worth of memory
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3304
--- Comment #5 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-19 13:15 MST ---
Surprise: according to the man page of 2.6.6, a receiving-end protect filter is
indeed placed on the partial dir, which is the same as the delay-updates dir.
Never mind comm
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3422
--- Comment #7 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-19 12:43 MST ---
(In reply to comment #6)
Great, so I do not need to do the testing. Thanks to all
for the effort.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3422
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
Today I went to back up my computer to an external disk with rsnapshot.
I have two copies of the Linux kernel; a few files differ, but matching
files are hard-linked between the two trees to save space. Since I
didn't give -H to rsync, it is making a separate file on the backup disk
from each hard
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3422
--- Comment #5 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-19 07:46 MST ---
(In reply to comment #4)
OK, I will do that (have done rpm's before), but it will take some time, as I'm
rather busy at the moment (~2 weeks). This way, Wayne also has some
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3422
--- Comment #4 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-19 06:57 MST ---
Yes, please do take a recent source RPM or source tarball and try the patch.
If you use rpmbuild, you can get it to apply the patch automatically after
unpacking the source
