rsync 2.6.6 nasty bug?

2005-12-09 Thread Jon Nelson
I believe I have encountered a nasty bug with rsync 2.6.6 "--delete-excluded" option. When this is enabled, rsync's operation appears to break entirely. I have a script that I've been using for a few years. The script hasn't changed in the last year or so. Recently I upgraded from SuSE 9.3 t

Re: batch applied: "Directory not empty (66)"

2005-12-09 Thread Raymond Keller
* Wayne Davison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [20051209 12:10]: > On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 10:45:35PM -0800, Raymond Keller wrote: > > In my source I have a directory that changed to a file. I know this > > requires --force or --delete, but using --only-write-batch I get no > > err

[Bug 3277] [Feature req] "I couldn't do something you asked" warning

2005-12-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3277 --- Comment #3 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-12-09 16:19 MST --- Instead of treating -o and -g specially, I think it is time rsync had separate archive options for "running as a normal user for a normal copy", i.e. using default destinatio

Re: batch applied: "Directory not empty (66)"

2005-12-09 Thread Wayne Davison
On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 10:45:35PM -0800, Raymond Keller wrote: > In my source I have a directory that changed to a file. I know this > requires --force or --delete, but using --only-write-batch I get no > error until I attempt to apply the batch. That's correct -- there's no problem generating t

Re: Any change of rsync using threads instead of fork?

2005-12-09 Thread Jamie Lokier
Wayne Davison wrote: > On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 03:22:23AM +, Jamie Lokier wrote: > > Is there any likelihood of changing the rsync code to use threads > > instead of processes? > > I just thought about this a bit more, and it didn't seem as large a task > as I had originally assumed it would b

Re: Any change of rsync using threads instead of fork?

2005-12-09 Thread Jamie Lokier
Nelson H. F. Beebe wrote: > List traffic today asks about changing rsync to use lightweight > threads instead of heavyweight fork. > > Before rushing into building a threads version of rsync, please READ > this recent article You didn't post a link directly to the article, just to the gateway pag

Re: rsync error - error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(420)

2005-12-09 Thread gg gg234
thanks for your reply.I have tried that also but still getting the same error On 09/12/05, Paul Slootman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri 09 Dec 2005, gg gg234 wrote:>> ssh: connect to host x.x.x.x port 22: No route to host > rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (0 bytes received so far) [sender]

Re: rsync error - error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(420)

2005-12-09 Thread Paul Slootman
On Fri 09 Dec 2005, gg gg234 wrote: > > ssh: connect to host x.x.x.x port 22: No route to host > rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (0 bytes received so far) [sender] > rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(420) > > this is related to ssh i believe.But when i try t

rsync error - error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(420)

2005-12-09 Thread gg gg234
Hi,    When i try to run rsync command from command linne it is working fine.Below is the command   /usr/bin/rsync --compress \   --verbose \   --rsh=ssh \   --times \   --owner \   --group \   --ignore-times \   --